Loading...

Question

Policy Change for Addressing Public Health

O‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍verview: Healthcare for a city, county or regional area has always been a concern for public administrators. The case study of Wyandotte County (see attached) is a reality that can happen anywhere, even in economic downturns and upturns. In cases, such as Wyandotte County, insights presented in Chapter Four (see attached) of the text can be brought forth in providing attainable solutions.

 ANANLYSIS QUESTIONS:

1.While healthcare is just one of many issues for the Unified Government and several of the other non-governmental organizations in the case, provide two alternatives in reframing how a‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍ metropolitan government approach could provide a meaningful impact on population health. Use specific examples from 

Chapter Four and relate them to the case elements or groups.

 2.What other “reframing” concepts could a public administrator put forth to show that a local government really have an impact on poverty and poor health?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Students will refer to the Executive Summary Guide that will provide the instructions for developing the Executive Summary Essay. The Executive Summary shall be in an essay format with a minimum of 500 - 600 words. Do not use footers in your p‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍aper.

Expert Solution

Executive summary

Healthcare for a population denotes a significant concern for public administrators, such as those in Wyandotte County, who assume a central role in mitigating public health challenges. Some of the greatest public health achievements could not prevail without policy assessment and change. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s list of varied health achievements, including demographic characteristics, diabetes, and motor vehicle safety have been involved in creating policy changes. The case study denotes an improvement in the average life expectancy for people living in Wyandotte County, United States increased to 76.8% in 2000 from 47.3% in 1900 (Wyandotte, n, d). The different readings tend to propose principles that are indispensable for policy change based on collective experiences, whose implications serve as a central motivation in mitigating public health challenges that continue to burden society.

Question one

Consideration of health equity policy serves as an alternative for reframing an approach that the metropolitan government can use to significantly influence public health. Equity is among the fundamental values of Health Impact Assessment, which is a pragmatic strategy for determining the negative or positive potential effects of the proposed policies, programs, and projects (Wyandotte, n, d). The metropolitan government can advance health equity through Health Impact Assessment, which necessitates having an assessment team that can authentically engage the society in addressing the social factors behind health challenges and root causes of inequalities during assessments and making recommendations.

The metropolitan government can rely on evidence to inform policies. Although policy creation or alteration is a sophisticated procedure necessitating the consideration of varied factors, including interests of stakeholders, feasibility considerations, and political standards, conducting sound research serves as the public health society’s commencement point when it designs and advocates for effective public health policy resolutions (Wyandotte, n, d). Policy creation or change should be founded on the best available survey evidence, with a common understanding that the status of evidence can vary across different public health matters and change over time. All policies, but especially, little-studied policies, new policies, or evidence-based policies that are custom-made to meet the requirements of several subpopulations, should comprise mechanisms for monitoring and examination to subsequently the effectiveness of the policies.

Question two

Another reframing concept that a public administrator could consider demonstrating an impact on poverty and poor health includes the use of proactive research-policy translation tactics. To intensify the translation of health policy study into policy, the public administrator can execute proactive approaches, which bridge the assessment and policy worlds (Wyandotte, n, d). This strategy fosters an increase in policy adoption and implementation. This tactic entails the engagement of broad coalitions that influence the degree of stakeholders’ recognition of the value and the necessity to change a policy. The strategy also facilitates partnerships between policymakers and advocates adept at creating the political strategy. The translation models detect gaps in evidence-based public health concepts, and by consolidating partnerships between investigators and policymakers, update the advancement of policy-relevant studies to fill those gaps.Designing a policy with a strategic implementation in mind is another way that public administrators can display a concern for poverty and poor health in a society. An administrator should perceive policy implementation from the commencement of the policy design procedure. Policymakers should contemplate different factors, such as whether an existing or novel agency will execute and enforce the policy, whether implementation necessitates hiring professionals, or whether it is necessary to change the management (Wyandotte, n, d). Strategic implementation caters to all people in society regardless of their status or social class since they equate eligibility criteria in terms of services covered by existing policies.

References

Wyandotte County. (N, D). Next Steps for Wyandotte County

Please enter your email address to h

  • 100% Plagiarism-free
  • 100% Human-written
Blurred answer