Overview:
Healthcare for a city, county or regional area has always been a concern for
public administrators. The case study of Wyandotte County (see attached) is a
reality that can happen anywhere, even in economic downturns and upturns. In
cases, such as Wyandotte County, insights presented in Chapter Four (see
attached) of the text can be brought forth in providing attainable solutions.
ANANLYSIS QUESTIONS:
1.While healthcare is just one
of many issues for the Unified Government and several of the other
non-governmental organizations in the case, provide two alternatives in
reframing how a metropolitan government approach could
provide a meaningful impact on population health. Use specific examples
from
Chapter Four and relate them
to the case elements or groups.
2.What other “reframing” concepts could a
public administrator put forth to show that a local government really have an
impact on poverty and poor health?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Students
will refer to the Executive Summary Guide that will provide the instructions
for developing the Executive Summary Essay. The Executive Summary shall be in
an essay format with a minimum of 500 - 600 words. Do not use footers in your paper.
Executive
summary
Healthcare
for a population denotes a significant concern for public administrators, such
as those in Wyandotte County, who assume a central role in mitigating public
health challenges. Some of the greatest public health achievements could not
prevail without policy assessment and change. The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention’s list of varied health achievements, including demographic
characteristics, diabetes, and motor vehicle safety have been involved in
creating policy changes. The case study denotes an improvement in the average
life expectancy for people living in Wyandotte County, United States increased
to 76.8% in 2000 from 47.3% in 1900 (Wyandotte, n, d). The different readings
tend to propose principles that are indispensable for policy change based on
collective experiences, whose implications serve as a central motivation in
mitigating public health challenges that continue to burden society.
Question
one
Consideration
of health equity policy serves as an alternative for reframing an approach that
the metropolitan government can use to significantly influence public health.
Equity is among the fundamental values of Health Impact Assessment, which is a
pragmatic strategy for determining the negative or positive potential effects
of the proposed policies, programs, and projects (Wyandotte, n, d). The
metropolitan government can advance health equity through Health Impact
Assessment, which necessitates having an assessment team that can authentically
engage the society in addressing the social factors behind health challenges
and root causes of inequalities during assessments and making recommendations.
The
metropolitan government can rely on evidence to inform policies. Although
policy creation or alteration is a sophisticated procedure necessitating the
consideration of varied factors, including interests of stakeholders,
feasibility considerations, and political standards, conducting sound research
serves as the public health society’s commencement point when it designs and
advocates for effective public health policy resolutions (Wyandotte, n, d).
Policy creation or change should be founded on the best available survey
evidence, with a common understanding that the status of evidence can vary
across different public health matters and change over time. All policies, but
especially, little-studied policies, new policies, or evidence-based policies
that are custom-made to meet the requirements of several subpopulations, should
comprise mechanisms for monitoring and examination to subsequently the
effectiveness of the policies.
Question
two
Another
reframing concept that a public administrator could consider demonstrating an
impact on poverty and poor health includes the use of proactive research-policy
translation tactics. To intensify the translation of health policy study into
policy, the public administrator can execute proactive approaches, which bridge
the assessment and policy worlds (Wyandotte, n, d). This strategy fosters an
increase in policy adoption and implementation. This tactic entails the
engagement of broad coalitions that influence the degree of stakeholders’
recognition of the value and the necessity to change a policy. The strategy
also facilitates partnerships between policymakers and advocates adept at
creating the political strategy. The translation models detect gaps in
evidence-based public health concepts, and by consolidating partnerships
between investigators and policymakers, update the advancement of
policy-relevant studies to fill those gaps.Designing a policy with a strategic
implementation in mind is another way that public administrators can display a
concern for poverty and poor health in a society. An administrator should
perceive policy implementation from the commencement of the policy design
procedure. Policymakers should contemplate different factors, such as whether
an existing or novel agency will execute and enforce the policy, whether
implementation necessitates hiring professionals, or whether it is necessary to
change the management (Wyandotte, n, d). Strategic implementation caters to all
people in society regardless of their status or social class since they equate
eligibility criteria in terms of services covered by existing policies.
References
Wyandotte
County. (N, D). Next Steps for Wyandotte County