Critically
read “Tangled Threats: Integrating U.S.
Strategies toward China and North Korea,” by Jacob Stokes, identifying and
dissecting his argument. This should include the identification of his thesis
and primary supporting arguments for that thesis. - Assess Stokes’ arguments by
applying the theories, frameworks, and concepts studied. - Write a 1,000 to
1,250-word thesis-driven essay that
(1) summarizes Stokes’
argument,
(2) analyzes
the strengths and weaknesses of Stokes’ argument by explicitly applying various
course concepts and frameworks, and
(3) incorporates and cites evidence to support your analysis. Students are not expected to use non-curricular sources to write their essays. Therefore, I will send references used during class to assist with the strategic frameworks for critical thinking discussed during class. See enclosed files for additional instructions and references
Summary of Jacob Stokes’
Argument
Subsequent disagreements and
efforts at peace between the United States and China and North Korea have
resulted in the formulation of strategies by the U.S. government. North Korea’s
involvement in this disagreement between United States and China powers stems from
their involvement in the foreign and security affairs with China. Additionally,
United States has been trying to resolve conflict, and for many years been at
war with China in the Korean Peninsula. After years of North Korea and China
having threats and leverage over each other, two heads of state namely Xi Jinping
and Kim Jong Un affirmed their agreement to a peace negotiation made years ago,
which did not entirely erase the conflict between the nations, but was followed
by reduced adherence to the U.N.’s sanctions of China on North Korea. Due to
this alliance, China was involved in the tension between U.S. and North Korea,
asking the government to reduce its sanctions against North Korea. The United
States government under Joe Biden’s leadership has declared its willingness to
exert pressure or have diplomatic negotiations with both countries. Washington’s
strategies include applying pressure on both states, engaging both states in
peaceful negotiations and applying pressure on one state while exerting
pressure on the other.
Considering the strategies by
the U.S. government against North Korea and China, Jacob Stokes makes
recommendations that may make the alliances and negotiations seem more
possible. He suggests that the U.S.-China relations should be revised where the
U.S. government should understand that the compartmentalization of China and
North Korea is impossible since they have had agreements in the past.
Additionally, the United States could improve its relations and strengthen its
coalition with South Korea, to bring more allies to its side and reduce the
chances of forming future enemies. As they do this, they could continue
peaceful negotiations with North Korea and China to reduce their nuclear wars
disagreements. The United States could declare an end of war, not as a peace
treaty but assurance that war tension against North Korea and China is over.
Another strategy employed could be geared towards empowering nations such as
South Korea to build their nuclear arsenals by employing technicians to
understand North Korea’s arsenal. This would also reduce fear in Japan and
South Korea, allowing both countries to have powers of their own. Lastly, U.S.
could continually engage South Korea, although discreetly on South Korea’s
engagements with China regarding the Peninsula. Therefore, Jacob Stokes’
arguments are based on the impracticability of U.S. government strategies and
could reduce the U.S.-China tension.