Systems Analysis & DesignCase Study Report
Date for Submission: Please refer to the timetable on ilearn (The submission portal on ilearn will close at 14.00 UK time on the date of submission) Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Assignment BriefAs
part of the formal assessment for the programme, you are required to submit a Systems Analysis & Design assignment. Please
refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general
information on preparing
and submitting assignments.
Learning Outcomes:
After completing the module, you should be able to:
1) Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of systems life cycles.
2)Critically evaluate different systems life cycles.
3) Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of systems analysis & design techniques.
4) Apply systems analysis and design techniques through a specific systems investigation, critically evaluating solutions.
5) Communicate effectively with stakeholders.
Graduate attributes: Effective Communication Communicate effectively both, verbally and in writing, using a range of media widely used in relevant professional context. Be IT, digitally a information literate.
Guidance
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in Arden University (AU) Harvard system(s). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.Maximum word count: 4,000 wordsPlease refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework
Please note the following:Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment.The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count.Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage point deductionAssessment Tasks (Learning outcomes 1,2,3,4,5)To make this assignment (and thus the module) more relevant and interesting for you, rather than give all students the same fixed (and artificial) case study, you will select your own real- world case study and then apply the concepts and techniques you have learned from this module to that case study.
IMPORTANT: The case study you select must not have been used by you, or any other student, in any other module – current or historic. Your chosen case study must original and unique to you and this present assignment. Do not recycle.
Question 1;This task is broken down into four subsections.
a)Select an industry, market sector or area of life that really interests you. It does not matter what you choose – as long as you are genuinely interested in it. It could be from any area of commercial life, the charity and voluntary sector, sport, leisure and hobbies or some aspect of government or public service. Document why you have picked a particular area – is it because you work in that sector? Is your hobby linked to that sector? Are you seeking to enter employment in that sector? Justify your choice.
b) Within your chosen area or sector, select ONE real-world organisation – it could be a profit-seeking private company, a charity or voluntary group, a sporting team or a public-sector agency like some aspect of the emergency services or a local or central government department or agency. Again, explain why you have chosen it.
c) Write a brief description of this chosen organisation. What do they do? Where are they based? What products, services and markets are they involved with?
d) Provide the web address of this organisation so that the marker can follow it up and, to add visual appeal, include a screenshot of their home page.
The above tasks will be marked holistically as a single grade. While their website and other online sources will give you a very good idea of what the organisation actually does, you will have to use your imagination to fill in some missing bits in order to answer the remainder of the tasks in this assignment. Document your own assumptions and fully reference any third- party sources that you have used to get additional background information. In short, start the assignment by clearly and fully introducing your selected case study so that the marker can fully understand your subsequent work.
;Imagine that your chosen case study organisation – which has its own internal IT team - has now employed you as a Systems Analyst. They have several IT projects in the pipeline. In order to help them prioritize projects and allocate resources, briefly describe the various stages of the SDLC (Software Development Lifecycle) and the role of the Systems Analyst within it. Support your discussion with suitable annotated diagrams.
Question 3[Your next task is to help the senior management of your case study organisation compare and contrast the ‘agile’ and ‘waterfall’ philosophies of software development – something they are aware of, but do not understand. Explain the techniques, strengths, weaknesses, and most suitable applications for each approach with regard to your chosen organisation. Again, support your discussion with suitable annotated diagrams.]
Question 4;Based on your advice, the management has now decided that their priority project will be a smartphone application to enhance customer sales and loyalty. The functionality, appearance and precise details of this application is obviously case-study dependant. Using your previous research into this organisation, combined with your own assumptions and imagination, address the following tasks in your role as a Systems Analyst with regards to your chosen organisation:
· State the exact purpose of your chosen application (real or imagined)
· Describe the stakeholders involved in the use and operation of that application
· List a set of functional and non-functional requirements for this application
·Produce a Context Diagram (Level 0) for this application
· Produce DFD (Data
Flow Diagram) - Level 1 & Level
2 for this application
· Produce a set of use case
diagrams for this application
· Produce an ERD (Entity Relationship Diagram) for this application
Each task is worth 5-6 marks each.You have the opportunity to submit a full draft of your work to receive formative feedback.The feedback is designed to help you develop areas of your work and it helps you develop your skills as an independent learner.If you are a distance learning student, you should submit your work, by email, to your tutor, no later than 2 weeks before the actual submission deadline. If you are a blended learning student, your tutor will give you a deadline for formative feedback and further details.Formative feedback will not be given to work submitted after the above date or the date specified by your tutor - if a blended learning student.
Referencing Guidance
You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the AU Harvard system(s).
Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Arden Library
Submission Guidance
Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail.
Your assessment should be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file. For more information please see the “Submitting an Assignment - Guide” document available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.)
Assessment Criteria: Level 5
Level 5 reflects the continuing
development in knowledge, understanding and skills from Level 4. At Level 5,
students are not expected to be fully autonomous but are able to take responsibility for their own learning
with appropriate guidance and direction. Students are expected to further
develop their theoretical knowledge within a more intellectual context and to demonstrate this through more
complex forms of expression which move beyond the descriptive or imitative
domain. Students are expected to demonstrate skills of analysis in both problem-solving and resolution. |
||
Grade |
Mark
Bands |
Generic Assessment Criteria |
First
(1) |
80%+ |
An exceptional information base exploring and analysing
the discipline, its theory and any associated ethical considerations. There
is sophisticated use and management of learning
resources and a high degree of autonomy is demonstrated. Writing is
exceptionally well structured and accurately referenced throughout. Where
appropriate, outstanding professional skills are demonstrated. The work is original and with some
additional effort could be considered for
internal publication. |
70-79% |
An excellent knowledge base within which the discipline
is explored and analysed. There is a good degree of originality in th e
approach. The work demonstrates confidence
and autonomy and extends to consider ethical issues. Learning
resources have been managed confidently. Writing is exceptionally well
structured and accurately referenced throughout. Where
appropriate, an excellent level of professional skills are demonstrated and
the work demonstrates a high level of intellectual and
academic skills. |
|
Upper
second (2:1) |
60-69% |
A very good knowledge base which explores and analyses the discipline, its theory and any
associated ethical issues.
There is evidence of some
originality and independence of thought.
A very good range of learning resources underpin the work and there
is evidence of growing confidence and self-direction. The work demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply theory
with good academic and intellectual skills.
Academic writing skills
are good, expression is accurate overall
and the work is consistently referenced throughout. |
Lower
second (2:2) |
50-59% |
A satisfactory understanding of the discipline which begins to analyse the
subject and apply
some underpinning theory. There may be reference to some of the ethical considerations. The work shows a sound level
of competence in managing
basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are good and accurate overall
and the work is planned and structured with
some though. Professional skills are satisfactory (where appropriate). The work lacks
original thought but academic and
intellectual skills are moving into
the critical domain. The
work is referenced throughout. |
Third
(3) |
40-49% |
Basic level of performance in which there are some
omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical
considerations. There is little evidence of
independent thought and the work shows a basic use of sources and
materials. Academic and intellectual skills are limited. Th e work may lack
structure overall. There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where
appropriate). There is an attempt to reference the work. |
Marginal Fail |
30-39% |
A limited piece of work in which there are clear gaps in
understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical
considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic and intellectual
skills are weak and there are errors in expression and the work may lack
structure overall. There are difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks
original thought and is largely
imitative. |
|
29% and below |
A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in
knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory and ethical considerations.
The work shows little evidence in the use
of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are very weak
and there are numerous errors in expression. The work lacks structure
overall. Professional skills (where
appropriate) are not developed. The work is imitative. |
A).Select an industry, market
sector or area of life that really interests you. It does not matter what you
choose – as long as you are genuinely interested in it. It could be from any
area of commercial life, the charity and voluntary sector, sport, leisure and
hobbies or some aspect of government or public service. Document why you have
picked a particular area – is it because you work in that sector? Is your hobby
linked to that sector? Are you seeking to enter employment in that sector?
Justify your choice.