Loading...

Question

The Indirect Impact of the 2015 Paris Attack

I‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍n this module's discussion initial post, you must complete an analysis of the direct or indirect impact of the RESPONSE to the 2015 Paris attacks. As you did in the previous module, you will choose to focus on either on the local and national impact (direct) or the global impact (indirect) of the RESPONCE. Comprehension Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) Eng‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍agement Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Critical Thinking Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (100%) Writing (Mechanics) Initial post and responses are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) specficially stick to the instruction‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍s

Expert Solution

A group of Islamic terrorists hit bars, restaurants, a major stadium and a concert hall in Paris on 13/11/2015. The attack led to approximately 130 deaths and hundreds wounded. Although most of the consequences were direct, affecting the local business and residents, also, the attack affected the global economy, security, and mental health. Therefore, some of the indirect consequences of the Paris attack in 2015 include the weakening of the global economy, insecurity, and mental health impacts.

In the Paris attack, terrorists focused on tourist areas such as restaurants, bars, concert halls, and stadiums. The attack affected global mental health as the victims were from different countries, including the British, California, Mexico, Tunisia, Madrid, and Chile. Hence, the attack psychologically affected people globally as they lost their loved ones (Vandentorren et al., 2018). Also, the attack weakened the global economy as investors lost their properties and thousands lost jobs, resulting in a reduction in consumer expenditure and international tourism (Krieger & Meierrieks, 2019). For example, European stocks closed, and international tourists cancelled plans. In addition, in the aftermath, the Paris government initiated strict border control measures to restrict illegal immigrants threatening the security of the millions of refugees in the country (Cragin, 2017). Therefore, although the Paris economy and residents were affected in the short run, the attack adversely affected the global economy and security in the long run.

The Paris attack in 2015 resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries for domestic and foreign individuals. Although the incident highly impacted the domestic business and residents psychologically, it also hurt the global psychology of the affected families and investors who lost properties. In addition, strict entry control measures affected the security of millions of refugees in the country.

References

Cragin, R. K. (2017). The November 2015 Paris attacks: The impact of foreign fighter returnees. Orbis, 61(2), 212-226. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2017.02.005

Krieger, T., & Meierrieks, D. (2019). The economic consequences of terrorism for the European Union. Terrorismus Als Herausforderung Der Europäischen Union, 87-108. doi:10.5771/9783748903581-87

Vandentorren, S., Pirard, P., Sanna, A., Aubert, L., Motreff, Y., Dantchev, N., . . . Baubet, T. (2018). Healthcare provision and the psychological, somatic and social impact on people involved in the terror attacks in January 2015 in Paris: Cohort study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 212(4), 207-214. doi:10.1192/bjp.2017.63

Please enter your email address to h

  • 100% Plagiarism-free
  • 100% Human-written
Blurred answer