You will be set a selection of
newspaper articles, opinion pieces, and so on. You must select two of them. You
will break down the underlying structure of the article, identifying the
various premises, the argumentative strategy used, whilst drawing attention
to any logical fallacies. Per se you will not be weighing in on whether the
conclusion is correct. Rather, you will be demonstrating your ability to
identify the underlying structure of an argument as well as your knowledge of
common logical fallacies.
Most individuals have
strong opinions regarding climate change, which can be pro or con, and are
sometimes conflicting. Part of the difficulties in accepting natural
conservative ideals is that most discourse in the news, by officials, and among
the general public is influenced by misconceptions and fallacies. Clarifying
these myths and fallacies may not resolve the policy argument. Still, it will
reduce the conversation's range, helping develop realistic measures that are
likely to be beneficial. In the twentieth century, just a tiny part of the
consequences of global warming was felt. Still, the proportion has escalated to
the point that virtually every nation is concerned about the future. As a
result, activists and ordinary individuals display distinct influences and
features, and many myths and misconceptions emerge. Therefore, analyzing the
effects of climate change is crucial in determining the various impacts and
characteristics currently experienced worldwide as a means of debunking rooted
myths and fallacies related to proving that climate change is a hoax.
The article by earth
eclipse '10 reasons to prove that climate change is a hoax' tries to show the
contradictor facts associated with climate change. The article disputes the
premise for global warming, claiming that different institutions, such as Al Gore,
predicted that 2014 would be the warmest year ever recorded (Eclipse, 2022).
This rationale was eventually discovered to be false, refuting the set
assertions. However, these organizations are not that far off the mark based on
historical statistics. The hazards of climate change are obvious, but the
grounds for their statements are dubious. They argue that to convince
individuals to believe in global warming, they must persuade them that the
future repercussions of climate change and global warming will eventually worry
them. The author goes on to demonstrate that, in reality, global warming is
likely not an issue that individuals should be worried about (Eclipse, 2022).
Nevertheless, global warming is not something that anyone wants to mess with.
There are several hazards involved.
Americans remain
resistant to aggressive and comprehensive action against global warming as
the overall situation becomes more serious and evident. According to previous
accounts, vast regions of the earth would become too hot for habitation, and those
left behind will expire as a result of the heat (WWF, 2020). Illnesses will
proliferate and change. Food shortage will return unless people transfer
farming from one ecosystem to another. Entire countries, such as Bangladesh,
and portions of other states, such as Miami, will be flooded (WWF, 2020).
Depletion of natural resources will affect both people and crops. If this
forecast appears too far-fetched, consider current weather events that continue
to break records to realize that the threat presented by global
warming may be catastrophic. Despite the data, global warming is the most
difficult and stubborn political issue that humanity has ever confronted. This
is not to suggest that no progress has been made. Even though the economy and
population have risen, greenhouse emission levels in the United States have
remained stable since 1990 (WWF, 2020). However, gas emissions have grown
substantially, putting humankind near the expected degrees of global warming. The
population has remained divided as scientific knowledge about the effects of
global warming has grown and a consensus view has evolved, and significant,
prominent segments of the political structure have remained uninterested (WWF,
2020). Therefore, global warming has been presented with much uncertainty,
causing people's beliefs about it to be split.
Furthermore, given the
evidence offered, the article's claim that climate change is a con is
adequately communicated. Set assumptions and forecasts fail to hold up in the
absence of proof. Ice Records, frigid temperatures, snow level documentation,
and other earlier statements are examples of unmet expectations (Eclipse ,
2022). As a result, this supports the idea that climate change is a hoax.
However, the foundation contains several misconceptions. Authorities,
activists, and incompetent scientists are extensively perpetrating the
"Climate Change" hoax on the American people (Eclipse , 2022). The
true research and facts are disregarded or distorted to meet the political
agenda. Organizations like the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) have changed peer review remarks from researchers who
disagree with the IPCC Evaluations (WWF, 2020). For example, in 2009, a whistle-blower
revealed hundreds of emails between IPCC experts at senior levels. These emails
detail their questionable tactics to silence opposing views and articles from
climate skeptics (WWF, 2020). Furthermore, the "Climategate Scandal"
revealed data tampering to conceal the post-1980 fall in air temperatures.
Global warming came to a halt in the mid to late 1990s (WWF, 2020).
Temperatures have been dropping since that period, according to the statistics.
Therefore, climate change and its instances are manipulated to fit a certain
plan, thus leading to more misconceptions.
Analyzing the effects
of climate change is crucial in determining the various impacts and
characteristics currently experienced worldwide as a means of debunking rooted
myths and fallacies related to proving that climate change is a hoax. The
article by earth eclipse '10 reasons to prove that climate change is a hoax'
tries to show the contradictor facts associated with climate change. It
disputes the premise for global warming, claiming that different institutions,
such as Al Gore. The rationale is that set assumptions and forecasts fail to
hold up without proof. Ice Records, frigid temperatures, snow level
documentation, and other earlier statements are examples of unmet expectations.
As a result, this supports the idea that climate change is a hoax. However, the
foundation contains several misconceptions. Global warming is not something
anyone wants to mess with, and several hazards are involved. Therefore, the
article is well articulated but possesses various fallacies about climate
change.
References
Eclipse,
E. (2022, July 19). 10 reasons to prove that climate change is a hoax.
https://eartheclipse.com/environment/climate-change/10-reasons-climate-change-is-hoax.html
WWF. (2020). Is climate change a hoax? https://wwfasia.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/natura_march_2020_1.pdf