Loading...

Question

Climate change

Y‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍ou will be set a selection of newspaper articles, opinion pieces, and so on. You must select two of them. You will break down the underlying structure of the article, identifying the various premises, the argumentative strategy used, whilst drawing attent‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍ion to any logical fallacies. Per se you will not be weighing in on whether the conclusion is correct. Rather, you will be demonstrating your ability to identify the underlying structure of an argument as well as your knowledge of common logical fallacies‌‌‌‍‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‍‌‍.

Expert Solution

Most individuals have strong opinions regarding climate change, which can be pro or con, and are sometimes conflicting. Part of the difficulties in accepting natural conservative ideals is that most discourse in the news, by officials, and among the general public is influenced by misconceptions and fallacies. Clarifying these myths and fallacies may not resolve the policy argument. Still, it will reduce the conversation's range, helping develop realistic measures that are likely to be beneficial. In the twentieth century, just a tiny part of the consequences of global warming was felt. Still, the proportion has escalated to the point that virtually every nation is concerned about the future. As a result, activists and ordinary individuals display distinct influences and features, and many myths and misconceptions emerge. Therefore, analyzing the effects of climate change is crucial in determining the various impacts and characteristics currently experienced worldwide as a means of debunking rooted myths and fallacies related to proving that climate change is a hoax.

The article by earth eclipse '10 reasons to prove that climate change is a hoax' tries to show the contradictor facts associated with climate change. The article disputes the premise for global warming, claiming that different institutions, such as Al Gore, predicted that 2014 would be the warmest year ever recorded (Eclipse, 2022). This rationale was eventually discovered to be false, refuting the set assertions. However, these organizations are not that far off the mark based on historical statistics. The hazards of climate change are obvious, but the grounds for their statements are dubious. They argue that to convince individuals to believe in global warming, they must persuade them that the future repercussions of climate change and global warming will eventually worry them. The author goes on to demonstrate that, in reality, global warming is likely not an issue that individuals should be worried about (Eclipse, 2022). Nevertheless, global warming is not something that anyone wants to mess with. There are several hazards involved.

Americans remain resistant to aggressive and comprehensive action against global warming as the overall situation becomes more serious and evident. According to previous accounts, vast regions of the earth would become too hot for habitation, and those left behind will expire as a result of the heat (WWF, 2020). Illnesses will proliferate and change. Food shortage will return unless people transfer farming from one ecosystem to another. Entire countries, such as Bangladesh, and portions of other states, such as Miami, will be flooded (WWF, 2020). Depletion of natural resources will affect both people and crops. If this forecast appears too far-fetched, consider current weather events that continue to break records to realize that the threat presented by global warming may be catastrophic. Despite the data, global warming is the most difficult and stubborn political issue that humanity has ever confronted. This is not to suggest that no progress has been made. Even though the economy and population have risen, greenhouse emission levels in the United States have remained stable since 1990 (WWF, 2020). However, gas emissions have grown substantially, putting humankind near the expected degrees of global warming. The population has remained divided as scientific knowledge about the effects of global warming has grown and a consensus view has evolved, and significant, prominent segments of the political structure have remained uninterested (WWF, 2020). Therefore, global warming has been presented with much uncertainty, causing people's beliefs about it to be split.

Furthermore, given the evidence offered, the article's claim that climate change is a con is adequately communicated. Set assumptions and forecasts fail to hold up in the absence of proof. Ice Records, frigid temperatures, snow level documentation, and other earlier statements are examples of unmet expectations (Eclipse , 2022). As a result, this supports the idea that climate change is a hoax. However, the foundation contains several misconceptions. Authorities, activists, and incompetent scientists are extensively perpetrating the "Climate Change" hoax on the American people (Eclipse , 2022). The true research and facts are disregarded or distorted to meet the political agenda. Organizations like the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have changed peer review remarks from researchers who disagree with the IPCC Evaluations (WWF, 2020). For example, in 2009, a whistle-blower revealed hundreds of emails between IPCC experts at senior levels. These emails detail their questionable tactics to silence opposing views and articles from climate skeptics (WWF, 2020). Furthermore, the "Climategate Scandal" revealed data tampering to conceal the post-1980 fall in air temperatures. Global warming came to a halt in the mid to late 1990s (WWF, 2020). Temperatures have been dropping since that period, according to the statistics. Therefore, climate change and its instances are manipulated to fit a certain plan, thus leading to more misconceptions.

Analyzing the effects of climate change is crucial in determining the various impacts and characteristics currently experienced worldwide as a means of debunking rooted myths and fallacies related to proving that climate change is a hoax. The article by earth eclipse '10 reasons to prove that climate change is a hoax' tries to show the contradictor facts associated with climate change. It disputes the premise for global warming, claiming that different institutions, such as Al Gore. The rationale is that set assumptions and forecasts fail to hold up without proof. Ice Records, frigid temperatures, snow level documentation, and other earlier statements are examples of unmet expectations. As a result, this supports the idea that climate change is a hoax. However, the foundation contains several misconceptions. Global warming is not something anyone wants to mess with, and several hazards are involved. Therefore, the article is well articulated but possesses various fallacies about climate change.

References

Eclipse, E. (2022, July 19). 10 reasons to prove that climate change is a hoax. https://eartheclipse.com/environment/climate-change/10-reasons-climate-change-is-hoax.html

WWF. (2020). Is climate change a hoax? https://wwfasia.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/natura_march_2020_1.pdf

Please enter your email address to h

  • 100% Plagiarism-free
  • 100% Human-written
Blurred answer