Once
again your boss has asked you to review a situation and make recommendations on
how to best accomplish his/her stated goal. The situation is as follows: Your
company has received a valid contract offer. If you accept this offer you will
be able to purchase a large amount of wheat, but, you are uncertain about what
market conditions will be in the near future. You need two weeks to do adequate
market research before you can accept or reject the current offer. At the same
time you are award that the person who extended the offer to you is in
conversation with other potential buyers. Your boss asks you if the current
offer has to be kept open until you make a decision to accept or reject the
offer. Alternately, is there a way the current offer can be made irrevocable
during the next two weeks. If there is a way to do this, how should your
company go about doing that? use your own words and here is some information:
CONTRACTS: NATURE, TERMINOLOGY AND CREATION: contract defined = a legally enforceable
promise - law treats it as a legal duty moral obligations - NOT legally
enforceable purpose of contracts law? Sources of Contract law:
1. common law = state law
2. Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) - a national law? Objective theory of contracts - KNOW THIS - based
on:
1. words spoken - be
very literal
2. actions taken
3. circumstances Requirements for the creation
of a valid contract:
1. agreement - normally
found in the Offer and the Acceptance
2. consideration =the bargained for exchange
of legal value that induced the parties to enter into the agreement
3. contractual capacity
4. legality Type of
Contracts: - handy terms - offer or and offeree -revocation of offer 1.
bilateral contracts - exchange of mutual promises of future action - contract
created when the promises are exchanged
2. unilateral contracts
- a promise of a future action exchanged for a return action - contract created
only when the requested action is fully performed
3. formal and informal
contracts
4. express contracts -
all the terms are stated - either in writing or spoken
5. implied contracts - (apply the objective
theroy of contracts to understand these contracts)
a. implied in fact
contract - 3 requirements
b. implied in law contracts = quasi-contracts
- apply ideas of unjust enrichment and quantum meruit Contract Performance
Terminology:
1. executed contract
2. executory contract
3. valid contract
4. voidable contract
5. void contract - no
real contract exists
6. unenforceable contract Agreement in
Contracts: agreement = a mutual, voluntary consent to the same bargain -
normally you can see this in the offer and the acceptance Requirements for a
valid Offer:
1. offer must display a
serious intent to be bound to the terms of the offer a. some statements that
are NOT offers: - statements made in jest, anger or undue influence -
expressions of opinion - statements of future intent - preliminary negotiations
- advertisements - auctions - with or without reserve - agreements to agree -
preliminary agreements
2. terms must be
reasonably certain or definite - must show - who the parties are - the subject
matter of the agreement - what work to be done? what quantity of goods? - the
consideration to be paid - the time of performance
3. the offer must be
communicated to the offeree Termination of an offer - how to kill off an offer
so no one can accept it general rule - an offer may be revoked at any time
before acceptance 1. termination by offeror: - express revocation
= words - implied revocation = actions - how to revoke general unilateral
offers Irrevocable offers: - merchants firm offer (UCC) - option contracts -
unilateral offer after performance has started
2. Termination by Offeree: - rejection of the
offer - counteroffers - always require an earlier rejection of original offer
Note - requests to negotiate DO NOT terminate an offer
3. Mirror Image Rule - common law
4. Termination by
operation of law: - lapse of time - offers only open a "reasonable"
amount of time - destruction of subject matter of the offer - death or
incompetency of either party - supervening illegality Acceptance of the Offer:
- requires a voluntary, unequivocal expression of agreement to terms of the
offer - must be communicated to the offeror - silence is normally not
acceptance - Mail Box Rule and its impact on acceptances Consideration:
consideration defined = bargained for exchange of legal value that induces the
parties to enter into the agreement (contract) adequacy of consideration - NOT
based only on monetary value effect of grossly disproportionate consideration -
this raises questions about the vountary nature of the agreement - courts will
look for: fraud duress undue influence unconscionability Agreements that LACK
consideration:
1. a pre-existing duty is used as subsequent
consideration - note - effect of unforeseen difficulties
2. past consideration
is used as subsequent consideration
3. illusory promises
note - requirements and outputs contracts are enforceable note
- agreements to settle
"claims" (debts)
- key is whether the
debt is a "liquidated debt" or an "unliquidated debt"
Promissory Estoppe
- is an exception to the consideration
requirement; elements of promissory estoppel:
1. one person makes a
clear and definite promise that they expect other person to rely upon
2. the promise was reasonable relied upon
3. the reliance was
substantial and detrimental
4. it would be "unfair" to not
enforce the promise Capacity and Legality Requirements: capacity refers to a
person legal power to enter into a contract - some people's power to do so is
limited by the law and law does act to protect those who lack capacity these
contracts are "voidable" by party that lacked capacity - they can
rescind the contract
- or that person can
enforce the contract (ratify it) after the condition that created the lack of
capacity is resolved Those lacking capacity: 1. mental incompetents
- use the "understanding test"
- note the legal consequence between a person
lacking lacking mental capacity and someone a court has already ruled is
mentally incompetent
2. intoxicated persons
- again use the
understanding test
- can rescind or ratify after they sober up
- is there a difference
based on what substance was the source of the intoxication? 3 minors = anyone
under age of majority = legal adulthood
- can rescind (return all consideration they
still have) at any time before they reach age 18
- or they can ratify after they reach age 18
Legality:
- law will not enforce
a contract that requires a person commit a crime
- these are "void" contract public
policy = promote competition - so most contracts that restrain trade
(monopolies and trusts) are illegal can have contracts to not compete in
limited situation can have exculpatory contracts = contract to "hold
harmless
- in limited situations -unconscionable
contracts are illegal -adhesion contract are illega
Contract offers are
presented as commitments between a business and potential customers. Given that
a possible change in purchasers is impending due to an extension policy created
in this case, the company in issue must make their existing offer irreversible.
Therefore, the corporation demands that the present offer be kept available
until a choice has been reached regarding whether to approve or disapprove it.
Although a stated period is given for deliberation, it is evident that the
proposal not made under seal and without consideration may be withdrawn at any
time before it is accepted in this situation. This is because, according to
common law, the provision of a period is merely a pledge to negotiate in good
faith, which is not legally binding. After all, it is made without
deliberation. It has been reaffirmed that even an offer made under seal or for
review to stay open for a specific period may always be withdrawn before that
period has passed, rendering a subsequent acceptance—given within that
time—ineffective. As a result, an irreversible agreement can only be achieved
through a legally binding contract. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the
scenario between the seller and the company to determine the best action to
make the contract irrevocable during the deliberation phase.
Whether one enters into
a relationship with a customer, a provider, or a freelancer, contracts are a
part of conducting business. They serve as legally enforceable agreements that
protect specific interests, making them crucial to everyone. As mentioned earlier,
the offer, acceptance, and consideration in the situation will result in an
irrevocable clause requiring a binding contract. When made, an offer is
frequently accepted until it is retracted. The irreversible provision outlines
the day and hour when the request is considered final. Therefore, the entity
making the offer is not permitted to revoke it before the specified time on the
selected date.The offer expires and ceases to be effective after the time and
date specified in the irrevocable clause. In the instance of the company, a
contract was formed between the contracting parties, and it was enforceable in
law due to a valid offer, consent, and agreement, as well as enough
consideration, capacity, and legality. Consequently, there have been cases
where an offer was made and accepted by the parties. In this view, the
demonstration of the irrevocability of the terms of the relationship necessitates
the exchange of something of significance for something of equal worth. The
wheat, in this instance, may be sold for anything else of value to prevent the
seller from creating new trading relationships to which they may trade the
commodity whatever they like. Therefore, a resource exchange might aid the
business in establishing an irreversible clause in the contract.It is critical
to evaluate the scenario between the seller and the company to determine the
best action to make the contract irrevocable during the deliberation phase.
Given that a potential change in purchasers is impending due to an extension
policy created in this case, the company in issue must make their existing
offer irreversible. The corporation demands that the current bid be kept
available until a choice has been reached regarding whether to approve or
disapprove it. As a result, an irreversible agreement can only be achieved
through a legally binding contract where the exchange of something of
significance for something of equal worth is needed. Therefore, the contract
can be irrevocable through resource exchange and legally binding features to prohibit
the seller from trading the wheat to potential buyers.
References
Johnson, A. (2019). Irrevocable gift
promises and promises inducing reliance: a mandate for the return of the seal
in contract law [Ebook]. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3267&context=nlr.
Verne, U. (2021). Contract Law – how to
create a legally binding contract - the University of La Verne small business
development center (sbdc). The university of la verne small business
development center (SBDC). https://lavernesbdc.org/news/contract-law-how-to-create-a-legally-binding-contract/#:~:text=Generally%2C%20to%20be%20legally%20valid,pledge%20to%20exchange%20these%20items.