Assignment
Overview Track down two different articles about the same topic and use them to
illustrate the rhetorical conventions of your discipline. One of the articles
should be intended to be read by "the general public" (i.e.,
non-specialists)—for example, newspaper or magazine articles, or most websites.
The second article should be written for an audience of experts in the
field—this could include articles in professional trade journals, conference
presentations, peer-reviewed scholarly research, or other appropriate sources.
When you have selected and read each article, identify and analyze how each one
uses the rhetorical categories of Purpose, Audience, Tone, Genre, and Context.
Use that analysis to explain how writing within your professional field is
different from writing for the general public. Note: You are not trying to
summarize the text or respond to the author's arguments. The content—what the
articles are aboutis not really important (although I do encourage you to
choose a topic that is interesting to you personally!). Instead, your goal is
to understand the authors' rhetorical choices, and how those choices illustrate
the ways people in your field "talk" to each other. You are pulling
apart these texts and showing how they work. Rhetorical Situation According to
Swales, "discourse communities possess and utilize specific genres."
What he means is that different disciplines use specific kinds of texts for
specific purposes, and professionals within the field have specific (although
often unstated) expectations about how those texts should be
crafted and presented.These conventions cover everything from whether to use
first or third person, when to use active or passive voice, how to cite
sources, and more. To communicate effectively with professionals in your field,
you need to be aware of those expectations. Purpose: Identify, analyze, and
compare the rhetorical features of documents both within and outside your
discipline to help your readers understand the writing conventions of the
field. Audience: Fellow UB students (or those in the general public) who participate
in your discourse community and would benefit from your explanation of
appropriate writing behaviors in the field. Genre: Professional report (note
that this varies depending on the discipline—an accountant, a lawyer, and a
marketing consultant will have different ideas about what a report is supposed
to look like; part of your job is to decide what is appropriate in your
own DC) Assignment Details ? 3 – 4 pages ? Track down two different texts about
the same topic, and one of them should be a website. Use them to illustrate the
rhetorical conventions of your discipline. ? Analyze how each article uses the
rhetorical categories of Purpose, Audience, Tone, Genre, and Context. Explain
how writing within your professional field is different from writing for the
general public. Other Requirements ? Cite at least 2 sources that you have
used in your research in either MLA or APA style. ? The Rhetorical Analysis
Report should f
The
documentation and communication of ideas by different authors and orators
depend on many factors, such as context and audience. A notable emergent issue
that has been a major cause of discourse has been the rising inflation as a
result of the pandemic in 2020. Therefore, this writ will comprehensively
consider the juxtaposition of discourse documentation between news and journal
articles with the same themes.