Question:
Marshall and Walras provide different foundations for studying market
equilibrium within neoclassical economics.Explain the main differences between
the Marshallian and the Walrasian approaches to market equilibrium and discuss
the implications for social welfare analysis. Have a clear introduction stating
your thesis. One paragraph per point. State your point, a rebuttal of your
argument, and how this rebuttal is flawed. Have a clear conclusion.
Market equilibrium is a
concept that has been extensively discussed by various academics and economists
throughout history. Despite this, the approaches and theories of Marshall and
Walras have taken center stage and have been echoed by various literature and
are used to drive various discourses regarding the concept. A common theme
between these two scholars' interpretations of this concept is their converging
premise of neoclassical economics, which makes it easier to compare and
contrast their approaches. However, their inherent interpretation and
understanding of this concept differ, leading to various implications for
social welfare analysis. Therefore, comparing and contrasting Marshall and
Walras's interpretation of market equilibrium will provide insights into the
differences between these approaches and their implications for social welfare
analysis.