crafting by
Mike Eisenberg and Ann Nishioka, Matthew Crawford makes the following
conclusive judgment: "that the crafting cproblem is in fact not reducible
to an algorithmic problem." In your answer, you must do two things:
1) explain what he means by this judgment
2) why is this an important truth to grasp.
Here are instructions to help
you in writing your essay responses. Your essay response is meant to be short.
In other words, your response should be around 6-7
sentences. Keep it short, succinct, and make it clear that you have answered
the question. Notice that there are two parts to this question. The goal
here is to ensure you have read, as well as to help you become more focused as
a reader and writer. Shorter answers are a bit more challenging, since they
require you to be more precise with your language and grammar.Again, this is
challenging, but helpful to hone in and develop your capacity to become good
writer.
The knowledge of crafting is
derived from one's interaction with the material world through understanding
nature and the systematic approach to crafting problems. Crafting integrates
aspects of mathematical calculations, technological techniques, art, and
history. However, according to Rosenberg, Crawford, and Nishioka, it is not
possible to rely on algorithmic solutions to solve problems that arise during
crafting, which is crucial in understanding the complexity of crafting
techniques.