Topic.
Social justice and sociolinguistics
Discuss how specific aspects of Rachel Jeantel’s speech in this videoLinks to an external site. could lead her to be the subject of linguistic discrimination. Which discourses position Rachel as an L1 or L2 speaker? Consider how multiple discourses can frame speakers as legitimate or illegitimate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY3XPf912-kLinks to an external site.
Incorporate the following:
- Incorporating sociolinguistics into the classroom (see Geeslin & Long 2014)
-
Sociolinguistics in the real world.
-
Inguistic discrimination
The essay must be series of reasoned statements supported by evidence leading to a logical conclusion(IN TEXT CITATION)
Headings, signposts, linking words and setnences
In text citation
don’t use Ai tools to generate texts 4.use only references provided
APA 7TH
Reference:
· Rickford, J. R., & King, S. (2016). Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language, 92(4), 948–988.
· Nordlinger, R. (2016, March, 1). We wouldn’t be mourning lost languages if we embraced multilingualism. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/we-wouldnt- be-mourning-lost-languages-if-we-embraced-multilingualism-55028Links to an external site.
· Eades, D. (2009). Testing the claims of asylum seekers: The role of language analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 30–40.
· Piller, I. (2016). Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
· Hymes, D. (2020). The scope of sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2020(263), 67-76.
· Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. Routledge.
Language and communication play a crucial role in
the daily lives of individuals as it promotes the shaping of interactions and
the perceptions of others. However, linguistic discrimination remains a
continuous challenge today due to the stigmatization and devaluing of certain
dialect varieties and speech patterns. Rachael Jeantel’s speech during the
trial provides evident material for linguistic analysis, and her utilization of
the African American Vernacular English (AAVE) features and non-standard
dialect subjects her to linguistic discrimination. Moreover, various discourses
place Rachael as an L2 speaker due to her speech patterns, thus revealing
society's biases and negative stereotypes. The relationship between these
discourses places Rachael as an illegitimate speaker, thus emphasizing the need
for better comprehension and acceptance of linguistic diversity.