Question
Embracing the Material World
crafting by Mike Eisenberg and Ann Nishioka, Matthew Crawford makes the following conclusive judgment: "that the crafting cproblem is in fact not reducible to an algorithmic problem." In your answer, you must do two things: 1) explain what he means by this judgment and 2) why is this an important truth to grasp. Here are instructions to help you in writing your essay responses. Your essay response is meant to be short. In other words, your response should be around 6-7 sentences. Keep it short, succinct, and make it clear that you have answered the question. Notice that there are two parts to this question. The goal here is to ensure you have read, as well as to help you become more focused as a reader and writer. Shorter answers are a bit more challenging, since they require you to be more precise with your language and grammar. Again, this is challenging, but helpful to hone in and develop your capacity to become good writer.
Expert Solution
The knowledge of crafting is
derived from one's interaction with the material world through understanding
nature and the systematic approach to crafting problems. Crafting integrates
aspects of mathematical calculations, technological techniques, art, and
history. However, according to Rosenberg, Crawford, and Nishioka, it is not
possible to rely on algorithmic solutions to solve problems that arise during
crafting, which is crucial in understanding the complexity of crafting
techniques.
The conclusion made by
Rosenberg, Crawford, and Nishioka that it is not possible to reduce problems
relating to crafting to an algorithmic problem could be explained by
considering the complexity of craft practice. According to the authors,
algorithmic reasoning cannot solve a crafting algorithmic problem, and instead,
crafting problems get solved through practice and manipulations of materials (Pedgley et al., 2018).
Therefore, Rosenberg, Crawford, and Nishioka aimed to illustrate the complexity
of crafting art that requires practice with systematic interaction with the
material world.
It is crucial to grasp the truth that crafting problems cannot be solved through algorithmic reasoning to master crafting techniques. For instance, crafting entails using computational tools ranging from the untouchable world, abstract, human dexterity, and creative practices beyond algorithmic/ mathematical calculations and instructions (Pedgley et al., 2018). Therefore, understanding that crafting problems require more inbuilt creative skills than mathematical solutions enhances one's expertise in crafting.Although there exist some algorithmic problems in the crafting process, to solve the problems, other techniques other than algorithmic solutions, such as practice and manipulation of materials, should be utilized. Understanding this fact is crucial in enhancing ones crafting expertise and ability to solve problems that may arise. For instance, crafting involves systematically understanding the materials in the world and their nature and creatively manipulating them.
References
Pedgley,
O., Şener, B., Lilley, D., & Bridgens, B. (2018). Embracing material
surface imperfections in product design. International Journal of
Design. eprints.ncl.ac.uk/file_store/production/238248/70D428CD-5988-4781-8342-0A4DC07001FF.pdf
Please enter your email address to h
- 100% Plagiarism-free
- 100% Human-written
Related Questions
- Outline Topic: AI in Global Health Policy: Ensuring Equity in Access to Automated Diagnostics
- The Heroism of Socrates
- Ethical and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care
- Philosophy Theories
- Embracing Nonhuman Entities
- Journal 1
- Innate Differences in Men and Women
- Liberal Thought on Labor
- Just War:
- Discussion Post