ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
Module Title |
Political Parties and Politicians in the UK |
||
Level |
5 |
Credit Value
of Module |
20 |
Assessment
Task |
Essay |
||
Word Count |
2,000 words |
Assignment
Description |
Essay Write a 2,000-word essay, based upon the answer to
the question below: ·
Does
the UK have a two-party or multi-party system? |
Essay Plan |
Introduction What is a two-party system? What is the multi-party system? What factors indicate that the UK parliament
system is a two-party system? What factors indicate that the UK parliament
system is a multi-party system? Does the UK still have a two-party system anymore? What about the 2017 election? What about the 2019 election? The historical context of elections’ changing Using the diagrams to provide evidence for our
argument The voters decline the two traditional parties
* Does the devolution influence the UK party
system, and how? Is Devolution the Real Reason Why Britain Is Not a Two-Party System
Anymore?
Conclusion:
“In
short, Britain is now a multi-party system. End of story!”
Reference |
Introduction
In the United Kingdom,
political parties primarily serve as the means of governance. Parties are
categorized as national, organized, or disciplined political groups at the system's
heart. Furthermore, the emergence of parties has affected the electoral process
and the dynamic between lawmakers and their people. This is because political
parties have significantly shaped the overall make-up of the British political
structure. Political groups can be two-party or multi-party, with more than two
parties having a chance to win the presidency. Therefore, the essay's objective
is to portray a balanced argument on the political system of the U.K. to
determine whether it is a two-party or multi-party system in its political
administration make-up.
A two party system
Different political
structures, including the two-party and multi-party regimes, have contributed
to the political system of the United Kingdom. Only the two major parties win a
significant majority of the popular vote in a two-party system. As a result,
the legislative may be taken over by one of the two (Thompson, 2020). In other words, a two-party system
is one in which no more than two entities or alliances, often positioned
on each side of the center, may create a predominance (Thompson, 2020). Other parties are relatively tiny
or only regional in this context. The two-party system's design forces players
to compete for a clear majority in certain election zones (Thompson, 2020). For example, the
electorate selects the executive director of the national representative forums
from single-member zones, typically between two competitive candidates (Thompson, 2020). Third-party
members in a two-party system have the choice to run for political office, but
failure is frequently the outcome unless they receive backing from one of
the two larger parties (Thompson, 2020). Therefore, only two main parties
receive traction in a two party system.
A multi-party system
The system of
government of the United Kingdom is multi-party. In this sense, the structure
is composed of several political parties, each capable of taking over
government institutions individually or in an alliance (Raymond, 2016). In other words, multi-party regimes
are those in which candidates from more than two or more parties are eligible
to run for office. In a legislature, the smaller entities may possess the
balance of power and therefore be asked to join forces with one of the bigger
parties to form a coalition, offer the government a resource and confidence
accord, or operate independently of the dominating parties. (Oaten et al.,
2019) Most frequently, coalition governments must be formed in situations where
there are three or more entities since no one organization can win power on its
own (Pilnacek et al., 2021).
With a coalition administration, political reform is frequently more
straightforward than under one- or two-party regimes (Raymond, 2016). Thus, in a multi-party system,
candidates from more than two parties are eligible to run for office.
Factors indicating that
the U.K is a two-party system
The U.K. has long been
thought of as having a traditional two-party structure. The Conservatives and
Liberals faced off in electoral reform, and the two entities would alternately
rule the administration (Thompson,
2020). Since the growth of Labour corresponded with the decline of the
Liberals, pundits continued to see British political affairs as basically
two-party in character even as the Labour Party grew in popularity in the 1920s (Thompson, 2020). As a result, polls
were primarily a two-horse battle amid Labour and the Conservatives by the mid
of the 20th century. Nevertheless, polls have been considerably more splintered
since the 1970s than in the middle of the century (Thompson, 2020). Although, when combined, Labour and
the Conservatives received a considerable majority of the vote in the 1950s, in
the two subsequent elections, just two-thirds of voters supported the two
parties (Pilnacek et al.,
2021). Elections in contemporary Britain were unmistakably taking on a far more
multi-party nature than they had in the past, beginning with the advent of the
Scottish National Party and a revived Liberal Party in the early 1970s (Thompson, 2020). Therefore, the
U.K has long been assumed to have a traditional two-party system where the
Conservatives and Liberals are faced off in an electoral format.
A two-party structure
predominated for a substantial portion of history, with the Labour and
Conservative factions being the only ones proficient to winning a majority of
votes and, thus, creating an administration. People voted for candidates that
best reflected their socioeconomic class, such as Labour for the ‘working class’
and the Conservatives for ‘the middle class’ (Oaten et al., 2019). These two parties maintained a
large proportion of the vote due to the apparent disparity between which
socioeconomic strata would profit from their reign (Oaten et al., 2019). In contrast, the U.K.'s
political party structure currently consists of several parties. The
Conservative and Liberal parties are the most prominent, controlling both
electoral politics and administrative affairs. The Labour party has
subsequently supplanted the Liberal party as the U.K.'s second-largest party (Pilnacek et al, 2021). As a
result, the U.K.'s electoral politics during the previous few years have
demonstrated the supremacy of the Labour and Conservative factions in producing
majority or coalition administrations.
To build the working
majority, the major political parties have been recruiting the aid of other
nationalistic or third parties. Consequently, in addition to the two major
parties, minor parties in the U.K., such as the Liberal Democrats, were created
due to the Liberal Party's alliance with the Social Democratic Party (Oaten et al., 2019). As a result,
it is conceivable to refer to the British party system as a two-party
structure, as this has historically been the situation in Britain during the
post-war period (Oaten et
al., 2019). However, the idea that the U.K. has a two-party system is also
dubious because there have been significant changes to the chronology of the
British party political system since the 1960s (Oaten et al., 2019). For instance, numerous third
parties in the U.K. have recently demonstrated a readiness to run for
additional seats in legislative bodies. In addition, there has been a clear
shift in electoral behaviour in certain instances (Oaten et al., 2019). As a result, everyone is aware
of the recent fall in backing for Britain's two conventional parties.he
Factors indicating that
the U.K is a multi-party system
Even though many
academics now agree that the British rule is not a two-party structure, some
still consider that British politics are a two-party occurrence for numerous
reasons. As per one theory, Britain appears to have a two-party government when
looking at party seat allocations (Prosser,
2018). In this regard, people should see Britain as having a two-party
structure, or at the very least, a two-and-a-half party framework, the
reasoning goes, since Labour and the Conservatives have the vast bulk of seats
in Parliament (Raymond, 2016).
However, when looking at historical elections, such a concentration on seat stakes
challenges the notion that the U.K has a two-party structure, just as it did through
the three-party era of the 1920s and 30s and as it has lately with the SNP's
historic victory in the 2015 election
(Oaten et al., 2019). Such a viewpoint also fails to recognize that the
U.K was ruled by a coalition from 2010 to 2015 and that minority Labour
administrations in the 1920s and 1970s depended on the Liberals to keep the
public confident. So, under this criterion, the British political system is
multi-party (Oaten et al.,
2019). Others have reacted by stating that although more than two parties
compete nationally, vote percentages are primarily split between two parties in
each local constituency (Oaten
et al., 2019). Therefore, the number of potential vote-winning factions should
be limited to two through tactical voting, even though the involved sides
featured most extensively may vary from one district to the next (Raymond, 2016). According to
earlier studies, the outcomes at the constituency level in Britain mostly
supported these forecasts.
Historical and recent
context of electoral polls trajectory
Additionally, the U.K.
has recently witnessed a series of extraordinary election events. A few of
these have had significant constitutional repercussions. All of them have
stated that the U.K. party state is in flux, exposing a political elite and
parties that cannot make sense of the outcome of ambiguous public sentiment (Hughes, 2017). They have
discredited leaders and frequently made parties appear incapable of responding
to the situation. They have posed several challenges to the U.K.'s major
parties that would have been unthinkable ten years ago (Simpkins, 2018). They finally raised some questions
about Britain's standing in the globe on several occasions. For example, the
Scottish Conservatives ultimately won all but one of the chairs on Populus'
"innate line" during the 2017 election (Hughes, 2017). Theresa May had hoped for a sizable
majority when she pushed for a new referendum that would give her the authority
she required to carry out her "dream of Brexit," but that majority
did not come to pass (Hughes,
2017). As a result of an accord with the DUP, the Conservative majority was
weakened, and a minority administration was established. The outcomes of the
2017 election ended the SNP's traction for individuality, ending the
nationalists' dominance of Scottish politics, and ushered in a new multi-party institution
divide alongside an ever-deepening legal split (Hughes, 2017). Consequently, the First Minister
admitted that she would have to delay her proposals for a timely independence
referendum (Vasilopoulou,
2020). As a result of the Conservative Party's sustained parliamentary impasse
over Brexit, while it was governing in the minority with support from the
Democratic Unionist Party and its failure to win the election in the 2017
general election, the 2019 United Kingdom general election still displayed a
multi-party leaning (UK
Parliamentary General Election 2019: Political Parties (GB & NI), 2019).
Therefore, the U.K has witnessed a series of election events where political
elites and parties have been exposed in regards to their public sentiment.
Devolution influence in
the U.K party system
Regional governments
were which fundamentally altered the political landscape of the once centrally
controlled British state. Through adopting political proportional
representation (P.R.) schemes in British polls, the growth of minor parties,
and the regional integration of British politics, devolution has significantly
influenced the U.K.'s transition from a two-party to a multi-party system (McMillan, 2019). Distinct
political structures and policy societies have emerged due to the various
electoral structures, with the same parties holding various positions across
the political scale, as well as a more substantial post-devolution involvement
in the formal public sector in Scotland than in England (McMillan, 2019). Moreover, after more than three
decades of coexisting with majority rule and P.R. polls, it has been shown that
voters respond differently in European and regional voting, with the latter
providing a better platform for small parties (McMillan, 2019). Thus, regional administrations
altered the political landscape where devolution has significantly influenced
the U.K.'s transition from a two-party to a multi-party system.
Good outcomes for
regional parties in devolved polls have not yet been reproduced in general
elections. Still, the SNP has unsurprisingly defied this trend (Oaten et al., 2019). Following a
decline in favour of the Liberal Democrats, surveys placed the SNP as the third
party in terms of seats at Westminster and as an expectedly important player
for the following term in the occurrence of a second consecutive parliament (McMillan, 2019). The SNP clearly
illustrates a group that transitioned from opposition to power because
devolution gave it the right conditions to grow into a more potent political
entity.
As previously said,
minor parties often expand when focusing on specific concerns rather than
offering alternatives to the Conservative and Labour parties' economic
platforms. The regionalization of British politics has altered this problem due
to devolution (McMillan,
2019). As a result, the two-party system would have resulted from the
socioeconomic status cleavage, which is currently more dispersed, but other
social disparities, such as the one between the centre and the peripheral, will
lead to political structures with more participants (McMillan, 2019). According to this line of
reasoning, the number of factions will be influenced by how nationalized
politics are rather than regionalisation (McMillan, 2019). Since devolution, Britain's transition to a
multi-party system has been positioned within a European tendency of
decentralized nations, where the centre-periphery divide has been more
significant in national politics in recent decades (McMillan, 2019). Therefore, Britain's
transition to a multi-party system has been positioned within a European
tendency of decentralized nations.
Conclusion
The essay's objective
is to portray a balanced argument on the political system of the U.K. to
determine whether it is a two-party or multi-party system in its political
administration make-up. Different political structures, including the two-party
and multi-party regimes, have contributed to the political system of the United
Kingdom. In a two-party structure, only two chief parties obtain a substantial
plurality of the vote from the individuals while multi-party regimes are those
in which candidates from more than two or more parties are eligible to run for
office. The U.K. has long been thought of as having a traditional two-party
structure but elections in contemporary Britain were unmistakably taking on a
far more multi-party nature than they had in the past. Additionally, the U.K.
has recently witnessed a series of extraordinary election events both in 2017
and 2019. A few of these have had significant constitutional repercussions. All
of them have stated that the U.K. party state is in flux, exposing a political
elite and parties that cannot make sense of the outcome of ambiguous public
sentiment. They have discredited leaders and frequently made parties appear
incapable of responding to the situation. Therefore, the U.K has been showcased
to have a multiparty system in its political administration.
Reference List
Hughes, D., 2017. The 2017 General
Election: Volatile voting, random results. [online]
Electoral-reform.org.uk. Available at: https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/latest-news-and-research/publications/the-2017-general-election-report/#sub-section-20 .
McMillan, F., 2019. Devolution, “new politics”
and election pledge fulfilment in Scotland, 1999–2011. British Politics,
15(2), pp.251-269.
Oaten, D., Kerr, D., Sandher, J., Hall, P. and
Yates, T., 2019. Is the party over for Britain’s two party system? - UK
in a changing Europe. [online] UK in a changing Europe. Available at: https://ukandeu.ac.uk/is-the-party-over-for-britains-two-party-system/ .
Pilnacek, M., Tabery, P., Prokop, D. and Kunc,
M., 2021. Apportioning uncertain voters in pre-election polls in a multi-party
system. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(4),
pp.973-985.
Prosser, C., 2018. The strange death of
multi-party Britain: the UK General Election of 2017. West European
Politics, 41(5), pp.1226-1236.
Raymond, C., 2016. Why british politics
is not a two-party system. [ebook] pp.1-6. Available at: https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/107735631/The_United_Kingdom_is_Not_a_Two_Party_System.pdf .
Simpkins, F., 2018. The 2017 General Election in
Scotland: A return to multi-party politics?. Revue française de
civilisation britannique, 23(2).
Thompson, L., 2020. Whither the two-party
system?. The end of the small party?,.
2019. UK Parliamentary General Election
2019: Political parties (GB & NI). [ebook] Available at: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-10/Political%20parties%202019%20UKPGE.pdf .
Vasilopoulou, S., 2020. Brexit and the 2019 EP
Election in the UK. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(S1),
pp.80-90.