Loading...

Question

Does the U.K. have a two-party or Multi-Party System?

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF

Module Title

Political Parties and Politicians in the UK

Level

5

Credit Value of Module

20                                   

Assessment Task

Essay

Word Count

2,000 words

 

Assignment Description

Essay

Write a 2,000-word essay, based upon the answer to the question below:

·        Does the UK have a two-party or multi-party system?

 

Essay Plan

 

Introduction

What is a two-party system?

What is the multi-party system?

What factors indicate that the UK parliament system is a two-party system?

What factors indicate that the UK parliament system is a multi-party system?

Does the UK still have a two-party system anymore?

What about the 2017 election?

What about the 2019 election?

The historical context of elections’ changing

Using the diagrams to provide evidence for our argument

The voters decline the two traditional parties

 

* Does the devolution influence the UK party system, and how?

Is Devolution the Real Reason Why Britain Is Not a Two-Party System Anymore?

 

Conclusion:

In short, Britain is now a multi-party system. End of story!

 

Reference

Expert Solution

Introduction

In the United Kingdom, political parties primarily serve as the means of governance. Parties are categorized as national, organized, or disciplined political groups at the system's heart. Furthermore, the emergence of parties has affected the electoral process and the dynamic between lawmakers and their people. This is because political parties have significantly shaped the overall make-up of the British political structure. Political groups can be two-party or multi-party, with more than two parties having a chance to win the presidency. Therefore, the essay's objective is to portray a balanced argument on the political system of the U.K. to determine whether it is a two-party or multi-party system in its political administration make-up.

A two party system

Different political structures, including the two-party and multi-party regimes, have contributed to the political system of the United Kingdom. Only the two major parties win a significant majority of the popular vote in a two-party system. As a result, the legislative may be taken over by one of the two (Thompson, 2020). In other words, a two-party system is one in which no more than two entities or alliances, often positioned on each side of the center, may create a predominance (Thompson, 2020). Other parties are relatively tiny or only regional in this context. The two-party system's design forces players to compete for a clear majority in certain election zones (Thompson, 2020). For example, the electorate selects the executive director of the national representative forums from single-member zones, typically between two competitive candidates (Thompson, 2020). Third-party members in a two-party system have the choice to run for political office, but failure is frequently the outcome unless they receive backing from one of the two larger parties (Thompson, 2020). Therefore, only two main parties receive traction in a two party system. 

A multi-party system

The system of government of the United Kingdom is multi-party. In this sense, the structure is composed of several political parties, each capable of taking over government institutions individually or in an alliance (Raymond, 2016). In other words, multi-party regimes are those in which candidates from more than two or more parties are eligible to run for office. In a legislature, the smaller entities may possess the balance of power and therefore be asked to join forces with one of the bigger parties to form a coalition, offer the government a resource and confidence accord, or operate independently of the dominating parties. (Oaten et al., 2019) Most frequently, coalition governments must be formed in situations where there are three or more entities since no one organization can win power on its own (Pilnacek et al., 2021). With a coalition administration, political reform is frequently more straightforward than under one- or two-party regimes (Raymond, 2016). Thus, in a multi-party system, candidates from more than two parties are eligible to run for office.

Factors indicating that the U.K is a two-party system

The U.K. has long been thought of as having a traditional two-party structure. The Conservatives and Liberals faced off in electoral reform, and the two entities would alternately rule the administration (Thompson, 2020). Since the growth of Labour corresponded with the decline of the Liberals, pundits continued to see British political affairs as basically two-party in character even as the Labour Party grew in popularity in the 1920s (Thompson, 2020). As a result, polls were primarily a two-horse battle amid Labour and the Conservatives by the mid of the 20th century. Nevertheless, polls have been considerably more splintered since the 1970s than in the middle of the century (Thompson, 2020). Although, when combined, Labour and the Conservatives received a considerable majority of the vote in the 1950s, in the two subsequent elections, just two-thirds of voters supported the two parties (Pilnacek et al., 2021). Elections in contemporary Britain were unmistakably taking on a far more multi-party nature than they had in the past, beginning with the advent of the Scottish National Party and a revived Liberal Party in the early 1970s (Thompson, 2020). Therefore, the U.K has long been assumed to have a traditional two-party system where the Conservatives and Liberals are faced off in an electoral format.

A two-party structure predominated for a substantial portion of history, with the Labour and Conservative factions being the only ones proficient to winning a majority of votes and, thus, creating an administration. People voted for candidates that best reflected their socioeconomic class, such as Labour for the ‘working class’ and the Conservatives for ‘the middle class’ (Oaten et al., 2019). These two parties maintained a large proportion of the vote due to the apparent disparity between which socioeconomic strata would profit from their reign (Oaten et al., 2019). In contrast, the U.K.'s political party structure currently consists of several parties. The Conservative and Liberal parties are the most prominent, controlling both electoral politics and administrative affairs. The Labour party has subsequently supplanted the Liberal party as the U.K.'s second-largest party (Pilnacek et al, 2021). As a result, the U.K.'s electoral politics during the previous few years have demonstrated the supremacy of the Labour and Conservative factions in producing majority or coalition administrations.

To build the working majority, the major political parties have been recruiting the aid of other nationalistic or third parties. Consequently, in addition to the two major parties, minor parties in the U.K., such as the Liberal Democrats, were created due to the Liberal Party's alliance with the Social Democratic Party (Oaten et al., 2019). As a result, it is conceivable to refer to the British party system as a two-party structure, as this has historically been the situation in Britain during the post-war period (Oaten et al., 2019). However, the idea that the U.K. has a two-party system is also dubious because there have been significant changes to the chronology of the British party political system since the 1960s (Oaten et al., 2019). For instance, numerous third parties in the U.K. have recently demonstrated a readiness to run for additional seats in legislative bodies. In addition, there has been a clear shift in electoral behaviour in certain instances (Oaten et al., 2019). As a result, everyone is aware of the recent fall in backing for Britain's two conventional parties.he

Factors indicating that the U.K is a multi-party system

Even though many academics now agree that the British rule is not a two-party structure, some still consider that British politics are a two-party occurrence for numerous reasons. As per one theory, Britain appears to have a two-party government when looking at party seat allocations (Prosser, 2018). In this regard, people should see Britain as having a two-party structure, or at the very least, a two-and-a-half party framework, the reasoning goes, since Labour and the Conservatives have the vast bulk of seats in Parliament (Raymond, 2016). However, when looking at historical elections, such a concentration on seat stakes challenges the notion that the U.K has a two-party structure, just as it did through the three-party era of the 1920s and 30s and as it has lately with the SNP's historic victory in the 2015 election (Oaten et al., 2019). Such a viewpoint also fails to recognize that the U.K was ruled by a coalition from 2010 to 2015 and that minority Labour administrations in the 1920s and 1970s depended on the Liberals to keep the public confident. So, under this criterion, the British political system is multi-party (Oaten et al., 2019). Others have reacted by stating that although more than two parties compete nationally, vote percentages are primarily split between two parties in each local constituency (Oaten et al., 2019). Therefore, the number of potential vote-winning factions should be limited to two through tactical voting, even though the involved sides featured most extensively may vary from one district to the next (Raymond, 2016). According to earlier studies, the outcomes at the constituency level in Britain mostly supported these forecasts.

Historical and recent context of electoral polls trajectory

Additionally, the U.K. has recently witnessed a series of extraordinary election events. A few of these have had significant constitutional repercussions. All of them have stated that the U.K. party state is in flux, exposing a political elite and parties that cannot make sense of the outcome of ambiguous public sentiment (Hughes, 2017). They have discredited leaders and frequently made parties appear incapable of responding to the situation. They have posed several challenges to the U.K.'s major parties that would have been unthinkable ten years ago (Simpkins, 2018). They finally raised some questions about Britain's standing in the globe on several occasions. For example, the Scottish Conservatives ultimately won all but one of the chairs on Populus' "innate line" during the 2017 election (Hughes, 2017). Theresa May had hoped for a sizable majority when she pushed for a new referendum that would give her the authority she required to carry out her "dream of Brexit," but that majority did not come to pass (Hughes, 2017). As a result of an accord with the DUP, the Conservative majority was weakened, and a minority administration was established. The outcomes of the 2017 election ended the SNP's traction for individuality, ending the nationalists' dominance of Scottish politics, and ushered in a new multi-party institution divide alongside an ever-deepening legal split (Hughes, 2017). Consequently, the First Minister admitted that she would have to delay her proposals for a timely independence referendum (Vasilopoulou, 2020). As a result of the Conservative Party's sustained parliamentary impasse over Brexit, while it was governing in the minority with support from the Democratic Unionist Party and its failure to win the election in the 2017 general election, the 2019 United Kingdom general election still displayed a multi-party leaning (UK Parliamentary General Election 2019: Political Parties (GB & NI), 2019). Therefore, the U.K has witnessed a series of election events where political elites and parties have been exposed in regards to their public sentiment.

Devolution influence in the U.K party system

Regional governments were which fundamentally altered the political landscape of the once centrally controlled British state. Through adopting political proportional representation (P.R.) schemes in British polls, the growth of minor parties, and the regional integration of British politics, devolution has significantly influenced the U.K.'s transition from a two-party to a multi-party system (McMillan, 2019). Distinct political structures and policy societies have emerged due to the various electoral structures, with the same parties holding various positions across the political scale, as well as a more substantial post-devolution involvement in the formal public sector in Scotland than in England (McMillan, 2019). Moreover, after more than three decades of coexisting with majority rule and P.R. polls, it has been shown that voters respond differently in European and regional voting, with the latter providing a better platform for small parties (McMillan, 2019). Thus, regional administrations altered the political landscape where devolution has significantly influenced the U.K.'s transition from a two-party to a multi-party system.

Good outcomes for regional parties in devolved polls have not yet been reproduced in general elections. Still, the SNP has unsurprisingly defied this trend (Oaten et al., 2019). Following a decline in favour of the Liberal Democrats, surveys placed the SNP as the third party in terms of seats at Westminster and as an expectedly important player for the following term in the occurrence of a second consecutive parliament (McMillan, 2019). The SNP clearly illustrates a group that transitioned from opposition to power because devolution gave it the right conditions to grow into a more potent political entity.

As previously said, minor parties often expand when focusing on specific concerns rather than offering alternatives to the Conservative and Labour parties' economic platforms. The regionalization of British politics has altered this problem due to devolution (McMillan, 2019). As a result, the two-party system would have resulted from the socioeconomic status cleavage, which is currently more dispersed, but other social disparities, such as the one between the centre and the peripheral, will lead to political structures with more participants (McMillan, 2019). According to this line of reasoning, the number of factions will be influenced by how nationalized politics are rather than regionalisation (McMillan, 2019). Since devolution, Britain's transition to a multi-party system has been positioned within a European tendency of decentralized nations, where the centre-periphery divide has been more significant in national politics in recent decades (McMillan, 2019). Therefore, Britain's transition to a multi-party system has been positioned within a European tendency of decentralized nations.

Conclusion

The essay's objective is to portray a balanced argument on the political system of the U.K. to determine whether it is a two-party or multi-party system in its political administration make-up. Different political structures, including the two-party and multi-party regimes, have contributed to the political system of the United Kingdom. In a two-party structure, only two chief parties obtain a substantial plurality of the vote from the individuals while multi-party regimes are those in which candidates from more than two or more parties are eligible to run for office. The U.K. has long been thought of as having a traditional two-party structure but elections in contemporary Britain were unmistakably taking on a far more multi-party nature than they had in the past. Additionally, the U.K. has recently witnessed a series of extraordinary election events both in 2017 and 2019. A few of these have had significant constitutional repercussions. All of them have stated that the U.K. party state is in flux, exposing a political elite and parties that cannot make sense of the outcome of ambiguous public sentiment. They have discredited leaders and frequently made parties appear incapable of responding to the situation. Therefore, the U.K has been showcased to have a multiparty system in its political administration.

Reference List

Hughes, D., 2017. The 2017 General Election: Volatile voting, random results. [online] Electoral-reform.org.uk. Available at: https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/latest-news-and-research/publications/the-2017-general-election-report/#sub-section-20 .

McMillan, F., 2019. Devolution, “new politics” and election pledge fulfilment in Scotland, 1999–2011. British Politics, 15(2), pp.251-269.

Oaten, D., Kerr, D., Sandher, J., Hall, P. and Yates, T., 2019. Is the party over for Britain’s two party system? - UK in a changing Europe. [online] UK in a changing Europe. Available at: https://ukandeu.ac.uk/is-the-party-over-for-britains-two-party-system/ .

Pilnacek, M., Tabery, P., Prokop, D. and Kunc, M., 2021. Apportioning uncertain voters in pre-election polls in a multi-party system. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(4), pp.973-985.

Prosser, C., 2018. The strange death of multi-party Britain: the UK General Election of 2017. West European Politics, 41(5), pp.1226-1236.

Raymond, C., 2016. Why british politics is not a two-party system. [ebook] pp.1-6. Available at: https://pureadmin.qub.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/107735631/The_United_Kingdom_is_Not_a_Two_Party_System.pdf .

Simpkins, F., 2018. The 2017 General Election in Scotland: A return to multi-party politics?. Revue française de civilisation britannique, 23(2).

Thompson, L., 2020. Whither the two-party system?. The end of the small party?,.

2019. UK Parliamentary General Election 2019: Political parties (GB & NI). [ebook] Available at: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-10/Political%20parties%202019%20UKPGE.pdf .

Vasilopoulou, S., 2020. Brexit and the 2019 EP Election in the UK. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(S1), pp.80-90.

Please enter your email address to h

  • 100% Plagiarism-free
  • 100% Human-written
Blurred answer