Question

The Meaning of Life

T‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍o whom it may concern the essay must only come from the 3 books. I can only have 3 refences. This paper must be to be in the MLA format.
1.Beauvoir’s treatment of the genuinely free human in The Ethics of Ambiguity, (Penguin) 1976, ISBN: 9780806501604.,

2.Freud’s assessment of the struggle between Eros and Thanatos in relation to human happiness Civilization and Its Discontents, (Norton) 2010, ISBN: 9780393304510.

 3.Camus’s analysis of the absurd and his insistence on not engaging in an act of eluding the absurd through a leap into faith or hope. Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays, (Random) 1983, ISBN: 9780679733737.

4. Message from my professor~ I must also have at least 4 relevant and explanatory quotes from the primary texts assigned below.  I must have at least one quote from each author, respectively. Remember that all quotes should be followed (or preceded) by an explanation of the quote. You should strive for, at least, two typed lines of your own explanation for every typed line of quote. Our discussion of Beauvoir, Freud, and Camus in this course does not suggest any overarching theme among them. And yet,‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍ their treatment and analysis of what a human being is, what drives a human being, and what underlies human existence does suggest a unifying thread among these thinkers. The follow-up question to a discussion of those previous topics, though, is whether their analysis of the human being and the human condition hinders or promotes concern for humanity. In other words, if we understand these three thinkers correctly, could we say that their insights into the human being lead to a responsibility for and duty to others? Make sure to explain the central insight of each of these thinkers, i.e., 1, 2, and 3 above Also, consider what each author would say about what a human being is, what drives a human being, and what underlies human existence, respectively. Once you’ve done that, assess how this insight does or does not lead to a concern for other human beings. Another way to think about this assignment is to ask if any of these thinkers’ ideas promote or could lead to an ethics. It might be the case that none of them will, only one or two will, or maybe all do. The important thing is to try to explain why you think each one does o‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍r does not.

Expert Solution

The meaning of life has become a critical question for philosophers throughout history, with the aim to define the role, responsibility, and characteristics of being human. Philosophers have attempted to achieve this aim through various spiritual, cultural, scientific, and metaphysical ideologies spanning history. Additionally, various philosophers have concluded differently in answering the question. These differences have had a significant impact on the concern for humanity and the extent of value for human life. This has ultimately resulted in different degrees of ethics in various philosophical standings. As shown in this paper, an example of three different conclusions and arguments on the meaning of life result in various degrees of ethics and value for human life. Therefore, it is critical to view some of these philosophical arguments and their impacts on the value of human life and ethics in society. 

This question has been solved!

  • Verified by Admin
  • Written by a Human Expert
Unlock Solution Get Custom Solution
Blurred answer

Related Questions