1.
Introduction. Tell your reader what you saw, where and when. Tell your reader
what your general response to the production was. Did you find it an enjoyable
experience? Why exactly? Did it give you food for thought? About what and why?
What did you learn about modern theatre practices?
2. The Direction. The director
is the person who, in the end, is responsible for what you see on stage. What
meanings in this play were emphasised. How did the design, staging, and
character and acting style choices draw attention to these? Were these choices
successful in creating the impact on the audience you thought the director and
creative team intended? Did the theatre itself and the playing area suit the
production? Why or why not? Were the stage pictures interesting and/or
attractive as well as meaningful? Was there an interesting and varied use of
stage space? Was the focus generally where it should be?
What did you think about
the pace of the production?
3. The Acting. Discuss the
acting. Was it of a particular kind? Stylised in some way, using masks, very
physical, reminded you of circus perfomers, very
melodramatic, realistic or ‘fourth wall’ (these are only a few of the
possibilities). What can you say about the kind of acting in this production
compared with the kind of work you’ve seen in other productions and done yourself?
Was the style of acting appropriate to the kind of play and style of
production? Why or why not? Which performances did you particularly admire? Be
very specific in saying why. 4. {The Music. How did the music contribute to the
overall production? Was the style of music appropriate to the rest of the
“action”? Were the songs sung well? Could you hear and understand the words to
the songs?
Was the orchestra playing in
tune, and together?}*
5. The Design. How did the design contribute to the production’s meanings? Describe the sets, lights and costumes. What kind of a statement did each of these make. 6. Conclusion. You might want to elaborate on your production. What did you particularly like about the production? How did it illumine your understanding of life?
"Into the Woods" is
a creatively written story by Stephen Sondheim that features familiar
characters from previous shows such as Snow White, Rapunzel, and Cinderella, as
well as newly created and introduced characters by the directors. In my opinion,
the expertise of the actors and our familiarity with some of them, the
synchrony of the show with the orchestra, and the stage setup have created such
flow, allowing the audience to follow and be engrossed in the story intended by
the scriptwriters. The play inspired my introspection on the existence of happy
endings for stories. I thought about the possibility of happiness, an ideal
state, without subsequent consequences in the future. Particularly, is it
possible to be truly happy, making choices in sync with our absolute joy
without the assurance of future consequences that are detrimental and could
shrink the previous joy experienced when making those choices? Using symbols of
the witch, the woof, the giant, and the woods, there's a contrast of the joys
and beautiful experiences in life, as well as the shadows that lurk, waiting to
attack when we are engrossed in the simple pleasures of life. Throughout the
play, I have observed the inclusion of narrator-like characters, humor, and
tonal variations of the characters, which enable the audience to understand the
play better.
The meanings emphasized in the
play can be seen clearly by the symbols used, the characters, and the story
development. Characters present from the start, such as Jack, Cinderella, and
The Baker and his wife, all have different wishes and must look beyond
themselves to have these wishes fulfilled. Generally, the scriptwriters have
used the woods as a symbol of life. The uncertainties presented, both good and
bad reflect the possibilities of joy, and the assurance of consequences unknown
to the person experiencing them are seen in the play. Characters such as
Rapunzel represent the position we all occupy, as victims of experiencing both
good and bad in life. The darkness in our lives, and our minds, which we may
certainly face in the future, is seen using characters such as the woods, the
witch, and the wolf. The conservative style employed in the play, with
different characters having costumes that represent their roles in the show,
the orchestra in the background, and the musical appeal of the play, gives clarity
to the characters employed in the show and their goal while going into the
woods. These choices surely influenced the audience's response, which pays
close attention as the plot develops and consistently chuckles, and claps
laugh, signaling attention to detail and the story in general. The stage
pictures are clear, and there is the proper use of stage space, with attention
to the characters being explained at a particular moment. Characters fitting
into a context at different stages and with changing backgrounds based on a
change in context explain the proper use of stage space.
The style of acting employed
is melodramatic when viewing the symbols, expressions of characters, and the
voices and tones used. The frequent changes in the stage and the words used by
characters that express their varying emotions are key elements of the
melodramatic style of acting. The elements of the play are meant to provoke
emotion in the audience, which can be seen throughout the play when there is a
response in terms of laughter and silence as the audience either reacts or pays
attention to see the play's progression. Additionally, the characters'
behaviors are exaggerated, which removes the tension from certain scenes and
makes serious moments more humorous. For instance, the audience isn't scared at
the wolf's appearance but pays close attention and claps and laughs in the end.
For this kind of production, the style is appropriate since the exaggeration
intrigues the audience and allows for the proper flow of the story. The absence
of a "wall" between the characters and the audience also enables the
latter's engagement and ease of transitions to different scenes. My favorite
scene in the play is the meeting of The Baker, his wife, and Jack with the cow
in the woods. The element of surprise when The Baker sees his wife and when
they both see the cow they were looking for is well tailored, in my opinion, by
the scriptwriters. I also admired Jack's performances, which were musical,
genuine, and humorous. He shows such loyalty to his cow, which is hilarious but
shows the purity of his intentions.
The directors of the play have
tailored the script with music. The characters' wishes are expressed musically,
and so are their conversations. The entire film, therefore, is a musical stage
production since all the characters, with their different voices and scripts to
play, employ a musical aspect in most parts instead of speaking. The musical
inclination of the film makes it even more interesting, continuing to interest
the audience. Additionally, it is used conversationally between the characters.
It is, therefore, a development to the plot as opposed to breaking the story
for entertainment purposes or having background music as the plot develops. The
characters and sometimes background voices sang the songs well, and the songs
could be well heard. The orchestra plays various instruments, with beats in
sync with each character. The audience can identify the mood in a particular
scene based on the music being played. For instance, tension is well captured
by the orchestra when the prince captures The Baker's wife in the woods after
she cut Rapunzel's hair. Also, in the play, the lights and the costumes
emphasize the change in contexts and the characters' roles, respectively.
Particularly, outside the woods, there is more stage illumination than in the
woods, which are dimly lit, especially during tense scenes.
Throughout the play, I enjoyed the musical stage production, that is, the use of music to tell the story of characters who go out into the world hoping to fulfill their wishes. I also liked that the play was not a "fourth wall" kind of acting, which allowed the narrator to interact with the audience freely, as the characters did. The proper development of each character and how each costume suits their role in the film made it more interesting. While watching, I understood the simplicity of film production. Specifically, it is possible to incorporate simple designs, common costumes, and stage settings but still make it more intriguing for the audience to communicate the scriptwriter's initial interest. Additionally, I learned that the idea of perfect execution and living is almost impossible. When the characters set out to go into the woods, they had anticipated fulfilling their desires. For instance, The Baker would meet the witch's demands and return to have the curse reversed. Viewing the quality of the film production and the lessons learned, the film was a wholesome production.