Question

Metaphysics of the Bible

**No plagiarism! I will check for any plagiarism. This will require more originality than the short papers; it has to be a real, grown-up philosopher paper (or at any rate, a decent college-try at such a paper). However, please write this paper as if you are explaining it to someone who has never encountered philosophy. ****This is supposed to be a 12 page paper, but if you can add more, please let me know. ***Possible articles that will help: Aquinas, Summa Theologica. Compatibilism vs. Incompatibilism: - Hume, one-paragraph excerpt from his Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (8.23). - Strawson, "Freedom and Resentment". - van Inwagen, "‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism". C. Arguments in Favor of Libertarian Free Will - van Inwagen, An Essay on Free Will, pp. 206-209. D. The Hobbes-Hume-Hobart Argument Against Libertarian Free Will - Hobart, "Free Will as Involving Determinism and Inconceivable Without It". E. Libertarian Responses to the Hobbes-Hume-Hobart Argument 1. Agent Causation - Griffith, "Why Agent-Caused Actions are Not Lucky", pp. 43-49. 2. Event-Causal Libertarianism - Anscombe, "Causality and Determinism", pp. 133-139. - Kane, “New Directions for an Ancient Problem,” pp. 223-237.F. Scientific Arguments Against Libertarian Free‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍ Will

Expert Solution

The Holy Book is a strict text that has been deciphered in different ways since forever ago. It contains mystical ideas that arrange with the idea of the natural world, presence, and the heavenly. The idea of choice is one such model. As per Aquinas, the unrestrained choice is viable with God's all-knowingness and destiny. He contended that God's foresight doesn't decide human activities yet. Instead, people act uninhibitedly in light of their own decisions. Then again, Hume contended for incompatibilism, which expresses that choice and determinism are contradictory. He accepted that humans are not entirely set in stone by earlier causes and that freedom of thought is a deception. In the Holy Book, there are examples where both compatibilism and incompatibilism can be noticed. For instance, in the tale of Joseph and his siblings, it very well may be contended that God's fate was viable with Joseph's freedom of thought to excuse his siblings. In any case, in the tale of Pharaoh and Moses, it tends to be contended that God's solidifying of Pharaoh's heart contradicted Pharaoh's choice. In general, the Good Book's mysticism is a complicated point that logicians have investigated since forever ago. The ideas of compatibilism and incompatibilism give alternate points of view on the idea of unrestrained choice and determinism corresponding to God's all-knowingness and fate.

This question has been solved!

  • Verified by Admin
  • Written by a Human Expert
Unlock Solution Get Custom Solution
Blurred answer

Related Questions