Ethnography

B‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍ased on the questions on the pervious coursework. use the same questions. the book is Riz life by David Treuer

1.How did this ethnography differ from previous class readings? How was it similar to previous readings?

2.What were the sources and/or evidence relied upon to construct the account? What sorts of methods were used? How was the data presented?

3.What is the basis of authority of the auth‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍or to make the account? (i.e. academic, cultural, etc or some combination). Evaluate the author’s credibility and explore what makes them appear (or fail to appear) an authoritative source for the subjects they discuss.

4.How do you feel towards this reading? What do you think about it? Has it changed your way of thinking at all? What ideas did it give you, or what unanswered questions do you still ha‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍ve?

1. How did this ethnography differ from previous class readings? How was it similar to previous readings?Although Treuer's ethnography differs from previous class readings, it shares some similarities with the readings. For instance, Treuer (2012) highlights that the US government's introduction of compulsory boarding schools for Indians aimed to eradicate the familial ties that hindered the civilization of Indians. This concept of the government's disregard for cultural ties is highlighted in the previous readings. It is also similar to previous readings as it accounts for how the communities tried to protect their rights. Treuer (2012) highlights the strife of this community to protect their rights through collaboration with the government. However, this ethnography differs from class readings due to its scope. Generally, this account has various similarities and differences with the previous readings.

This question has been solved!

Verified by Admin
Written by a Human Expert

Unlock Solution Get Custom Solution

Question

Ethnography

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Related Questions