Final Essay: Prompt
(Due Wednesday morning, Dec. 6, by 10:00 AM)
Assignment Rationale:We’ve spent the semester building up to a writing a relatively short original research essay using both primary and secondary sources.You’ve built a bibliography, analyzed the historiography, developed a prospectus, and worked with primary sources. Now is the time when you put this all together.
The Assignment:Write an original research essay in the style of a peer-reviewed journal article (I’ve posted a model essay with this prompt). This means that your essay should: introduce the topic and its significance, assess the existing historiography (in this case it’s not the total historiography, it is just the four books or equivalent that you’ve had approved), introduce a new question that you will be trying to answer with your primary source research, and then use the primary sources to construct an analytical or narrative (or both) essay. To make it easier, I recommend that you follow the following script (you can use my headings but you don’t have to):
Introduction (c.
1-2 pages)
This
section will introduce the topic and its significance and then preview the
contribution (i.e. what you’re going to be doing that is new) and argument
you’ll be making. If you need to provide a brief summary of key events, it
should go in this section.
Historiography (c.
2-4 pages)
This
section should provide a summary of the existing historiography in a manner
that highlights what’s missing from that historiography (the lacuna!).
Original
section based mainly in the primary sources (c. 4-8 pages)
If you
are using headings, name this something related to your argument (e.g. “The
Hidden Origins of the Nicaraguan Peace Process”). This section should be the
bulk of your essay and mostly use primary sources to tell whatever story you’re
trying to tell in either an analytical or narrative (or both) fashion. In our
primary source essay earlier, I asked you to only use primary sources. For this
part of your final essay, you are welcome to intersperse primary and secondary
sources, but this section should be based overwhelmingly on your original
research in the primary sources. This should not be a summary of events based
in the secondary sources.
Conclusion (c. 1
page)
Reiterate
what has come before in the paper.
Bibliography
in Chicago Style
Key Requirements:
1.The paper should be written
in your best, most polished prose. Revise, revise, revise.
2.The paper should be from 8-15
pages in length (roughly 2400 words to 4500 words)
3.The paper should be in
12-point font and double spaced.
You must cite all of your
evidence using Chicago Style. I am going to hammer you on this if you don’t
have this right by now, so make sure you get this right.
Follow the instructions above
carefully. This paper has specific requirements.
a.Be vigilant about
plagiarism. Make sure you use YOUR OWN WORDS or put quotation marks around
information drawn from the text. Cite your sources. If you plagiarize it’s a 0
on the assignment and I have to report your academic misconduct to the College.
b.Start early and work on it a
little bit every day.
c.Think hard and have fun!
Operation Condor, a secret operation in the unstable
South American landscape of the 1970s and 1980s, cast a shadow over the
right-wing cone, targeted left-wing groups, and left a lasting legacy of
atrocities and unanswered questions. The study examines regional security,
leftist insurgencies, and integrated states. Although existing studies have
examined Condor's historical trajectory and responses, the present article
seeks to contribute by critically reconsidering the written history that has so
far shaped the understanding of this operation. Importantly, the study attempts
to raise a new question that focuses on an overlooked aspect: the extent to
which the U.S. has been involved and with much support from leaders from the Southern
Cone.