Sociology 1A 2022 - Essay
Marking Criteria
This sheet summarises the
central criteria that markers on the Sociology Level 1A course use when they
are evaluating and grading summative essays. It is intended to help you
understand more clearly what markers are 'looking for' as they mark your work.
In the first instance your
markers will have the following overall 'learning outcomes' in mind as they
mark your essays. Your summative assessments for Level 1A, including your
submitted essay, are designed to assess your ability to do these things:
describe and examine a range
of key concepts and theoretical approaches within sociology and evaluate their
application;
summarise and explain the
findings of empirical sociological research, including a critical assessment of
the methodological frameworks used;
evaluate the relationship
between sociological arguments and evidence in a range of contexts;
draw on evidence from a range
of appropriate sociological sources and demonstrate an ability to synthesise
them
evaluate competing
explanations and draw reasoned conclusions.
More specifically, markers are
guided by the following questions:
1. Is there a clear attempt to
address all parts of the question that is being answered?
2. Does the essay show knowledge of course
literature, and does it effectively and accurately summarise and explain
relevant aspects of that literature?
3. Does the essay demonstrate
an ability to evaluate relevant sociological concepts and theoretical
approaches, and if this is relevant to the question - to relate these to
empirical evidence from a range of sociological studies?
4. Does the essay demonstrate
an ability to evaluate competing explanations and to draw well-reasoned
conclusions?
5. Is there a well-structured
argument, with appropriate paragraphs, a clear introduction and a clear
conclusion?
6. Does the essay show
evidence of a reasonable level of preparatory reading? (n.b. Essays are likely
to focus most closely on two or three sources, but are expected to show
evidence of engagement with at least six articles, chapters or other relevant
material, largely drawn from the course reading lists).
Finally, your markers will
consider how well the essay demonstrates a range of practical skills related to
effective academic writing and presentation.
7. Were sources referenced
systematically & accurately, using the Harvard system? 8. Were quotation
marks and/or indenting used to indicate direct quotations?
9. Were sources in the
reference list given in alphabetical order, by author surname, and was full
bibliographic information provided for each source?
10. Was the essay
well-presented and laid out?
11. Was the essay edited and revised effectively so that it was no more than 1,500 words in length (including in-text references but excluding the bibliograph
In Bourdieu's theory,
the accumulation of symbolic items that one accumulates via belonging to a
certain social class is capital. Sharing comparable types of capital with
others, such as cultural capital, fosters a feeling of group identification and
status. Bourdieu, however, also highlights cultural capital as a crucial factor
in social inequality. Similar to wealth or income, some forms of cultural
capital are more valued than others and can promote or prevent social mobility.
Cultural capital, according to Bourdieu, can be institutionalized, objectified,
or embodied. While one's language is an illustration of embodied cultural
capital, a nice car or music record is a form of cultural capital in its
objectified state. Cultural capital, in its institutionalized form, relates to
credentials and accolades, such as degrees or awards, that signify cultural
authority and competence. Therefore, analyzing the form of capital by Pierre
Bourdieu is crucial in determining the various forms of inequality experienced
in society.