Topic: Sport
Readings:
Chapter 18 Subjective understanding of 'subculture': Contemporary roller derby in Australia and the women who play in Youth cultures and subcultures by Pavlidis (2015)
The social bordering of lifestyle sports: inclusive principles, exclusive reality by Rannikko et al. (2016)
Key terms
sport |
lifestyle sports |
competitive sports |
incorporation |
regulation |
organization |
Symbolic subcultural capital |
social inclusion/ exclusion |
DIY |
community |
hegemonic masculinity |
structural-functionalist approach |
social conflict approach |
physical capital |
equality |
Try to use the above vocabulary when answer questions.
1) How do both readings describe and analyse “lifestyle sports” as
significant to youth culture? Why would some young people choose to participate
in these kinds of sports versus traditional, competitive sports?
2) How do you see the readings as reflecting either the
“structural-functionalist” or “social conflict” approaches to studying the
sociology of sport?
3) According to Pavlidis, how do women push their bodies and play with
their identities in roller derby? In what ways are they affirming and
challenging gender norms, and playing with other aspects of identity? How do
you see young men do this in other sports?
4) Lifestyle sports are often positioned as “open” and “alternative” to
the mainstream. How is this not always the case? How can lifestyle sports be
incorporated and regulated? And, how can “mainstream” sports be subcultural or
alternative?
5) Is (or was) sport important to you as a young person? Why? What about
the sport is or was most important to you and how was it part of your youth
culture?
1.How do both readings
describe and analyse “lifestyle sports” as significant to youth culture? Why
would some young people choose to participate in these kinds of sports versus
traditional, competitive sports?
The readings
demonstrate how young cultural depictions from across the world distributed
through several modern media platforms help establish and sustain lifestyle
sports. Young people are drawn to lifestyle sports because they depict
sociality, joyous inventiveness, speed, and thrill, as well as their urban
sensuality and subcultural distinctiveness from mainstream sports (Baker et al., 2016). The
arguments of social and cultural openness uphold this difference.
2.How do you see the
readings as reflecting either the “structural-functionalist” or “social
conflict” approaches to studying the sociology of sport?
The readings are more
relevant to social conflict other than structural functionalist approach because
athletics is where we witness societal power struggles. It has been observed
that gender conflict inhibits social engagement and uses reciprocal social
influence to further contradictory interests.
3.According to
Pavlidis, how do women push their bodies and play with their identities in
roller derby? In what ways are they affirming and challenging gender norms, and
playing with other aspects of identity? How do you see young men do this in
other sports?
Women are stretching
the confines of gender as a new generation of sports enthusiasts navigates the
intersection of delight, pain, and power dynamics. For instance, pushing limits
has provided a socio-cultural study of roller derby's emergence and rebirth as
a brand-new, globally-accessible women's sport and a regular venue for creative
leisure (Rannikko et al.,
2016). Furthermore, roller derby has developed into a gendered arena for
self-transformation, community, and embodied competition where both men and
women are encouraged to accept pain, feel emotions profoundly, and push past
boundaries.
4.Lifestyle sports are
often positioned as “open” and “alternative” to the mainstream. How is this not
always the case? How can lifestyle sports be incorporated and regulated? And,
how can “mainstream” sports be subcultural or alternative?
One of the newest
trends in digital media is lifestyle sports, which are leading the way. As a
result, they produce high interaction as a crucial component of the ingestion
of sports media. But in lifestyle sports, as opposed to other sports where
public interest is primarily driven by competition, spectators are typically
drawn in by the sight of the action. Lifestyle sports have so typically
received poor representation on major broadcasts emphasizing on hegemonic
masculinity (Baker et al.,
2016). Either they were perceived as being too specialized or too radical. The
discussion of how well the integrated principles correspond with the residing
reality is also answered differently by different actor roles, even though
lifestyle sports have the potential to be open and specialists in their sports
groups are likely to learn considerate attitudes toward diversity. As is
typical in every social setting, the restricted activities of lifestyle sports
are not always apparent to those who are not barred (Rannikko et al., 2016). As a result, theoretical
communication approaches may be credited with adopting lifestyle sports by
presenting hybrid actions of attitudes and conceiving discourse as a potent
force for coordinating participation in lifestyle sports.
5.Is (or was) sport
important to you as a young person? Why? What about the sport is or was most
important to you and how was it part of your youth culture?
Sport is important to
me as a young person in the additional values gotten from the endeavor. Every
human has to participate in sports to stay physically and physically strong. It
is very significant at every stage of life. Additionally, it enhances people's
personalities. In youth culture, sports boost and improve our confidence
levels. We may be more active and healthier if we play sports regularly.
References
Baker, S., Robards, B., & Buttigieg, B.
(2016). Youth cultures and subcultures. Routledge.
Rannikko, A., Harinen, P., Torvinen, P., &
Liikanen, V. (2016). The social bordering of lifestyle sports: inclusive
principles, exclusive reality. Journal Of Youth Studies, 19(8),
1093-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1145640