Question
Module 7 Discussion
For this
Discussion, you will summarize the results of applying the critical thinking
process to the case, and reply to one of your classmates. You must post first
before you will be able to see the posts of your classmates. Start a New
Thread, and for the subject type your name. Then, write three paragraphs, as
follows: Identification (one sentence in bold print) State the main
ethical/moral issue you identified. You may copy/paste the main ethical/moral
issue you previously identified in Module 4. Decision
(150 words minimum) State your decision, and describe how you determined it to
be morally justified. You may copy/paste the decision portion of your Module 7
Dropbox: Decision, Evaluation, Reflection assignment. Reflection (150 words
minimum) Share your thoughts about the critical thinking process. You may
copy/paste the reflection portion of your Module 7 Dropbox: Decision,
Evaluation, Reflection assignment..
Expert Solution
Identification;What is Tom supposed to perform with the completely approved and abandoned plan?
Decision;Tom's moral course of action is to speak with Mr. Morie and alter the flawed plan. The decision is morally justified based on utilitarianism theory, which states that a morally right action results in the ultimate net utility for all stakeholders. First, Tom will be at peace because his worries about the ecosystem are resolved even though he loses his internship. Secondly, those who depend on fish for a living will not have to walk miles. Thirdly, owners can conduct business effectively and likely not incur losses (Eggleston). Therefore, according to act utilitarianism, the decision results in a net utility for most stakeholders involved as such should be a morally correct decision for Tom.
This question has been solved!
- Verified by Admin
- Written by a Human Expert
