Annotated Bibliography
Worksheet
Reference 1 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 2 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 3 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 4 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 5 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 6 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 7 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 8 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 9 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Reference 10 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
|
In your own words, what are
the key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
|
What 3 details from this article
are you likely to include in your final project? Be specific. Use your own
words. (3 pts) |
1. 2. 3. |
How do you know that this is
a scholarly or credible source? (2 pts) Note: Using the UMGC
databases is not sufficient justification. What makes the article trustworthy
and scientific? |
|
Annotated Bibliography
Worksheet
Reference 1 |
|
Reference in APA format (2
pts) |
Black, M. M., Walker, S. P.,
Fernald, L. C. H., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., McCoy, D. C.,
Fink, G., Shawar, Y. R., Shiffman, J., Devercelli, A. E., Wodon, Q.,
Vargas-Barón, E., & Grantham-McGregor, S. (2017). Early childhood
development coming of age: science through the life course. The Lancet,
389(10064), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31389-7 |
In your own words, what are the
key findings? (8 pts) In 100-300 words (2-5
paragraphs), summarize the main findings in your source. |
This article claims that
early childhood development programs differ in quality and coordination and
are marked by inequitable and inadequate access, particularly for children
under three. From its statistics, 43% of children below five years in the
middle- and low-income nations have an increased chance of not attaining
their development potential. As such, the article underpins the need to
improve the quality of childcare in responsive caregiving, nutrition, health,
and early learning to help kids develop creativity and intellectual skills
and improve their well-being. To make sure that high-quality childcare
programs are available up until the age of eight years, monitoring,
synchronization, and inspection are essential across sectors. Action is
required at the regional, nationwide, and international levels to secure political
support and funding for early childhood development. |