Boundary Crossing

Introduction

A boundary can be considered a sociocultural distinction that causes engagement to discontinue. As such, most encounters, whether business-related or social, entail limits from forming boundaries. The study makes use of data from case studies of salesperson acting as a boundary spanner. Salespeople have a crucial, cross-functional role in establishing long-term client connections that may be an unrivaled competitive power source. They serve as the corporation's main point of contact with consumers, produce pertinent information from outside the company's borders, and affect prices, affecting revenues. Personal selling in the field is the main sales channel, particularly in the business-to-business (B2B) scenario. Therefore, the critical appraisal of boundary-crossing issues from both a theoretical and practical perspective will help determine the trends experienced in boundary-crossing work to design a boundary-crossing intervention within businesses.

Section 1:

1.What would you critically appraise when faced with a boundary-crossing issue, both from the theoretical and practical perspective?

Theoretical perspective of boundary crossing

Regarding boundary crossing issues, cultural differences are a significant obstacle to efforts to bridge boundaries. As a result, it is necessary to analyze theoretical and practical viewpoints on this subject. In the work context, two concepts—cultural-history activity theory and role theory—have been crucial in characterizing probable forms of continuity across sociocultural endeavors (Daniels et al., 2009). Additionally, each form relates to how a person moves between different places, interacts with others, and uses various materials and artifacts to perform a bridge role. This connection between ideas and domains thus illustrates how limits may exist both inside and within the fields of employment, learning, and daily living (Akkerman & Bakker, 2011). As an illustration, consider how the nature and effect of forefront in B2B firms are changing due to new market dynamics. In such a setting, the Ackermann steering will take into effect where relations interconnected. As a result, it is suggested that the growth of boundary role theory will be response to the new realities of corporate border work and that it sparks the creation of an organizational framework with fresh ideas for theory and practice (Bessant et al., 2012). This in context serves an advantage. Therefore, cultural differences are an issue in boundary-crossing, and the analysis of the theory viewpoints helps determine the connection between ideas and domains.

The classification of the boundary crossing factors begs the question of their interrelationship. Thus, considering the implications of these mechanisms enables one to think about border crossing and boundary objects at a more fine-tuned level. There is a definite trend to concentrate on developing coordination concerning the idea of border objects (Akkerman & Bakker, 2011). Boundary artifacts emerge with socially structured and disruptive procedures that give them significance; thus, they do not always flow across populations of practices smoothly and un-problematically and fulfill the demands of everybody (Macpherson & Jones, 2008). As a result, boundary objects serve a dual purpose: enhancing negotiation and understanding of differing viewpoints while eliminating the necessity for social connection and participation, such as in coordination (Tsui & Law, 2007). Ultimately, a single observation applies to all four mechanisms: The intersection of the crossing social realms or the border dissolution is not the result of a dialogue at the boundary (Kerosuo, 2001). Therefore, bridging boundaries should be viewed as a process of building continuity in a context of sociocultural variance rather than as a process of transitioning from initial variety and plurality to uniformity and cohesion. This also applies to the transformation strategy, in which the exchange of current practices leads to creating something new because of the distinctions between them (Akkerman & Bakker, 2011). This raises the question of whether these activities may eventually evolve into a new core endeavor.

Integration of theoretical perspectives into practical settings in boundary crossing

One of the most well-known theories in relation to sociocultural endeavors and boundary-crossing is the idea of role theory. This is partially because the integration of functional and social role components results in compelling role identities. Role theory contends that salespeople carry out a cohesive collection of actions and behaviors that are recognizably marks of archetypal, readily classified role identities by leveraging competence over a diverse variety of patterns, scripts, and related behaviors (Daniels et al., 2009). For instance, a salesperson's status as someone the client can rely on to work cooperatively is validated and confirmed by successfully enacting a prototypical identity, such as a "friend" (Akkerman & Bakker, 2011). Additionally, clients might deduce the underlying expectations and standards that direct interactions toward desirable outcomes like collective understanding and collaboration when salespeople play out a prototype identity, which activates socially coded programs (Bessant et al., 2012).. However, the use of roles reinforces commonly held prejudices thus further enhancing formed borders. In the case of the executives’ role in a business setting such as a corporation, the theory reinforces the individual in relation to their ability to fulfil expectaions rather than create roles. As such, predictability falls as an aspect of limiting boundary crossing endeavours. Therefore, role theory is critical as a model, given its potential to be used in social scenarios where a collection of behaviors and activities may result in business collaboration.

Within and between the spheres of business interactions, there exist boundaries. For instance, boundaries between specialties, responsibilities, and different cultures working together are present (Bessant et al., 2012). Unsurprisingly, research is heavily focused on the effectiveness of salespeople in bridging the gap between the company and a client (Engeström, 2001). Most salesperson studies look at the salesperson as the role-taker in border sales. The aspirations of those who are essential, principally the clients and the hiring firm, determine the sales function (Kim et al., 2018). Salespeople must balance the competing interests of their employer's business and the interests of the clients, who make up the two players in the selling transaction. Boundary sales positions frequently involve difficult situations where the aspirations of the exchange partners conflict, and the salesperson must choose where to focus their selling efforts (Daniels et al., 2009). Outside-selling salespeople focus most of their pitching energy on consumers and are mainly concerned with the company's performance (Keszey, 2018). On the other hand, inside-selling salespeople aim more of their selling efforts at their own company than outside sellers to assist clients in making a satisfactory acquisition choice. Therefore, it is necessary to identify four mechanisms of learning at the border, which may be summed up as identification, coordinating, reflecting, and transformation.

A boundary-crossing viewpoint serves as the foundation for the conceptual framework, which is itself defined by a workplace cognitive perspective with roots in contextual learning theory and activity theory. These two ideas emphasize the possibility of learning at the borders of several practice communities (Gustavsson & Säfsten, 2017). As was previously noted, the success of new launches depends on the collaboration between two distinct practice groups. Clusters of practice are essential learning settings based on teamwork, interpersonal interaction, and the sharing of a shared repertoire, such as procedures, tools, and other items that reproduce the practice-based community (Gustavsson & Säfsten, 2017). Intrapersonal and interpersonal contacts can promote group work between individuals and specific demographics on the local scale without any boundary-crossing taking place at the administrative level (Gustavsson & Säfsten, 2017). It is believed, however, that boundaries on the other different levels must be crossed before breaching restrictions on the organizational level.

Real life instances of boundary crossing as a salesperson

Salespeople cross-organizational and geographic barriers, making them boundary spanners. They are thus the first to find out what rivals are doing. Therefore, reporting to executives on their rivals' new products and tactics is a crucial task for them (Keszey, 2018). Similarly, salespeople communicate directly with clients and learn a lot about their requirements (Kerosuo, 2001). The companies are then given the data by the sales associates, who utilize it to develop new products, modify their present ones, and restructure their marketing strategies (Edwards, 2011). The challenge is conveying the data to the proper business decision-makers. Many businesses utilize CRM tools like Netsuite or Salesforce.com to give salespeople a way to enter client information and others a way to access it (saylord, 2012). For instance, the marketing division of a business can use this information to identify certain client groups to reach out to directly. The material may be used to refine and develop marketing strategies and better comprehend the people who make purchasing decisions (saylord, 2012). Consequently, marketing decision-makers may target trade exhibitions where prospective consumers are likely to be present. In other words, marketing executives may collect this data from a customer database without explicitly asking salespeople what their clients' needs are (Keszey, 2018). As a result, there is a connection continuum where corporate interactions can vary from simple transactions or one-time acquisitions to valuable strategic alliances.

Section 2:

2.How would you critique the trends you have been considering in boundary-crossing work thus far in the light of your intended design of a boundary-crossing intervention?

Trend and intervention identification

As a trend, concerns regarding expected means to cross boundary will be considered. As such, a methodology for intervention design is required to enhance boundary spanning in the context of business (Gustavsson & Säfsten, 2017). An activity system will be the focal point of the to understand economic opportunities and exploitation while creating value for the parties involved (Edwards, 2011). Its relationship to the theoretical framework of role theory illustrates the need for intervention measures. This may be recognized by seeing the issue scenario as being inside a system, where the framework enables the identification of the problem situation's effects and causes and the creation of a causal link flow diagram (Macpherson & Jones, 2008). A logical, reasonable, and linear cause and effect path can also be used to construct the flow of causes to consequences inside a problem scenario (Engeström, 2001). As a result, fundamental problems and how they interact may be better identified and dealt with.

Activity system and salesperson as a boundary spanner

The relationship between the intervention's utilization role theory indicates a diverse set of options, resources, and capacities to carry out the boundary-spanning endeavor (Macpherson & Jones, 2008). Therefore, each of these decisions impacts the venture's output and changes what operating expenses are needed when corporate strategies and financial budgeting are necessary.

The activity system aims to capitalize on an opportunity by benefiting all stakeholders, including the firm and its partners, by satisfying customer wants and producing customer surplus. This goal generates the value-creating insight around which the business pivots, and it is represented in the Customer Value Proposition (Edwards, 2011). For instance, sales representatives serve their clients in addition to representing their companies. A salesperson articulates the client's demands whenever they return to their firm with the desired specification, whether for a speedier delivery, a modification to a specific product, or negotiated pricing. Salespersons must also choose which contracts are the most valuable and have the highest chance of winning because they have limited time (Kim et al., 2018). When a sales associate decides to chase an account, they develop a plan, put it into action, and see whether they can close the deal. As a result, it is the salesperson's job to ensure the offering is delivered correctly and to the client's delight (Gustavsson & Säfsten, 2017). Salespeople understand that attracting and keeping clients matters most in business, not creating friends. Although customers frequently choose the items of salespeople they like, liking someone is not sufficient. It is the responsibility of salespeople to conclude the deal with the client (saylord, 2012). They must also understand that the objective is to close as many sales as possible in the future, not just one. As a result, adopting the activity system highlights the collection of interconnected organizational processes focused on the focal company, including those carried out by the focal business alone and by partners, clients, and suppliers.

Real life instance of boundary crossing endeavours  

Consider the prospector's function as a boundary-spreading salesman, for example. A salesman whose main responsibility is finding prospects, or future clients, is known as a prospector. The prospective consumers possess a need, but for various reasons, they are not purposefully searching for items to fill it. These reasons could be that they don't know where to look for such products or don't have the time (Lam et al., 2022). Prospectors frequently make numerous phone calls and a lot of door-to-door knocking, a practice known as "cold calling" because it involves speaking to potential clients "cold" (saylord, 2012). Their primary duty is to promote, but the practice that fuels their accomplishment is prospecting, which is a boundary-crossing endeavor (Lam et al., 2022). Prospectors include many salespeople who deal with customers and offer aesthetics, financial services, or coverage. In certain B2B scenarios, the prospector identifies a lead and gives it to a different salesperson to close the deal (Edwards, 2011). Or the prospector might proceed with the sale by guiding the prospect through it. Although making sales is the primary duty, prospecting is the task that fuels a salesperson's performance (saylord, 2012). Moving further, management teams and prospectors might collaborate on a boundary bridge to strive to reach their objectives. Therefore, boundary crossing showcases the various merits experienced in value-creating insights from a firm point of view.

Ultimately, the boundary-crossing trends are crucial in clearly defining development and collaboration in businesses and B2B organizations. Within key business divisions, for instance, resource information may be shared (Daniels et al., 2009). Consider the interrelation of an account manager and a prospector in boundary spanning. Account managers are in charge of maintaining a relationship with a client who utilizes a product. A prospector may find a new client and then refer them to an account manager, or new customers may be so uncommon that the account manager is solely in charge of finding and working with them. For instance, the Texas Rangers baseball franchise hired Taylor Bergstrom, a Baylor University alumnus, as a sales representative to start his career (saylord, 2012). To sell customers fifteen-game bundles or other special promotional giveaways, Bergstrom spent a great deal of time phoning those who had bought single-game tickets. Bergstrom works for the club as an account manager right now (saylord, 2012). Whether the Rangers win or lose, he collaborates with ticket holders to ensure they have a wonderful experience throughout the season. His sales objectives include moving season ticket holders into more costly seats, locating referral prospects for new season ticket sales, and offering special event bundles to seat holders (Lam et al., 2022). As a result, while most account managers work with corporations, others, like Bergstrom, cross boundaries by working with consumers. Additionally, account managers must find lead consumers and cultivate connections with them. Lead users are in an excellent position to assist in developing new or improved products for a business (saylord, 2012). Account managers cultivate connections between these main users and their organizations for the two businesses to collaborate on innovation. Ultimately, it is crucial to cultivate collaborative abilities, perspectives, and dispositions that would focus on understanding, accepting, and being able to adapt to a variety of viewpoints, efforts, and support systems that may even adequately tackle some of the most complicated problems.

Conclusion

The critical appraisal of boundary-crossing issues from both a theoretical and practical perspective will help determine the trends experienced in boundary-crossing work to design a boundary-crossing intervention within businesses. Most encounters entail limits from forming boundaries. This results from the limit of the domain or group determining what constitutes mastery or central involvement in various social settings. For instance, cultural differences are a significant obstacle to efforts to bridge boundaries. As a result, it is necessary to analyze theoretical and practical viewpoints on this subject. In the work context, two concepts—cultural-history activity theory and role theory—have been crucial in characterizing probable forms of continuity across sociocultural endeavors. Additionally, given the problems with boundary spanning, an intervention design methodology is needed to improve boundary spanning in the context of business relating to salesperson as a boundary spanner. This will center on an activity system as a way to comprehend possibilities and exploitation by generating value for the parties concerned. As such, cultivating collaborative abilities, perspectives, and dispositions tackles some of the most complicated problems encountered with boundaries.

References

Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review Of Educational Research, 81(2), 132-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435

Bessant, J., Alexander, A., Tsekouras, G., Rush, H., & Lamming, R. (2012). Developing innovation capability through learning networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 1087-1112. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs026

Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). Activity theory in practice (pp. 126-139).

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal Of Educational Research, 50(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal Of Education And Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747

Gustavsson, M., & Säfsten, K. (2017). The learning potential of boundary crossing in the context of product introduction. Vocations And Learning, 10(2), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9171-6

Kerosuo, H. (2001). ‘Boundary encounters’ as a place for learning and development at work. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 3(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v3i1.5128

Keszey, T. (2018). Boundary spanners’ knowledge sharing for innovation success in turbulent times. Journal Of Knowledge Management, 22(5), 1061-1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2017-0033

Kim, M., Sudhir, K., Uetake, K., & Canales, R. (2018). When Salespeople manage customer relationships: Multidimensional Incentives and Private Information [Ebook]. https://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d30/d3022.pdf.

Lam, S., Ahearne, M., & Ahearne, M. (2022). Sales force performance: a typology and future research priorities. Handbook of Business-To-Business Marketing, 451-472. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376878.00035

Macpherson, A., & Jones, O. (2008). Object-mediated learning and strategic renewal in a mature organization. Management Learning, 39(2), 177-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607087580

saylord. (2012). The role professional salespeople play. Saylordotorg.github.io. https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-marketing-v2.0/s16-01-the-role-professional-salespeo.html.

Tsui, A., & Law, D. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1289-1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.003