Question
Course Professionalism
Professionalism
Self-Evaluation
Directions
1.Evaluate your behavior
related to each trait. Use the yellow highlighter tool to highlight the “level”
for each trait being evaluated that best describes your level of
professionalism in the course.
2.Record your total item score
for each trait being evaluated.
3.On a separate page (1 page
maximum), explain your evaluations, giving specific information to support your
evaluation. Submit to the Assignment page in Canvas.
Note: Final professionalism
scores will be based on your instructor’s evaluation, and your self-evaluation
will be used as part of that evaluation.
Traits Being Evaluated
Presence in course (2 points)
·
Level 5 (2 pts.): 100% of the time was fully
present and active in the course in all mediums provided (messaging, video,
discussion forums, Voicethreads, and any other mediums)
·
Level 4 (1.5 – 1.99 pts.): 90-80% of the course
time was present and active in the course at least once in all mediums provided
(messaging, video, discussion forums, Voicethreads, and any other mediums
·
Level 3 (1 – 1.49 pts.): 70-60% of the course
time was present and active in the course at least once in some mediums
provided (messaging, video, discussion forums, Voicethreads, and any other
mediums)
·
Level 2 (0.5 – 0.99 pts.): 50-40% of the course
time was present and active in some medium provided (messaging, video,
discussion forums, Voicethreads, and any other mediums)
·
Level 0 (0 pts.): Less than 40% of the course
time present and active in the course at least once in all mediums provided
(messaging, video, discussion forums, Voicethreads, and any other mediums)
Item score (out of 2 pts.
max.):
Adherence to course policies
and professional practice in communication (1 point)
·
Level 5 (1 pts.): Always (100% of class)
adhered to course policies and was always appropriate in all course
communications with instructor and other learners
·
Level 4 (0.8 – 0.99 pts.): Most times (75% of
class) adhered to course policies and was always appropriate in all course
communications with instructor and other learners
·
Level 3 (0.6 – 0.79 pts.): Sometimes (50% of
class) adhered to course policies and was always appropriate in all course
communications with instructor and other learners
·
Level 2 (0.4 – 0.59 pts.): Rarely (25% of
class) adhered to course policies and was always appropriate in all course
communications with instructor and other learners
·
Level 0 (0 pts.): Never adhered to course
policies and was always appropriate in all course communications with
instructor and other learners
Item score (out of 1 pts.
max.):
Involvement in the course and
shares own experiences and viewpoints (1 point)
·
Level 5 (1 pts.): Is involved in the course and
often shares ideas appropriately
·
Level 4 (0.8 – 0.99 pts.): Is mostly involved
in the course and shares ideas about 75% of the time
·
Level 3 (0.6 – 0.79 pts.): Is sometimes
involved in the course and shares ideas about 50% of the time
·
Level 2 (0.4 – 0.59 pts.): Is rarely involved
in the course and on occasion may share ideas
·
Level 0 (0 pts.): Never appears involved in the
course
Item score (out of 1 pts.
max.):
Appropriately participates in
analysis of practices under discussion (1 point)
·
Level 5 (1 pts.): Consistently is able to
discuss multiple perspectives in any form of written communication (formal
[papers] or informal [chatrooms, forums, etc.])
·
Level 4 (0.8 – 0.99 pts.): Sometimes is able to
participate in analysis of multiple perspectives
·
Level 3 (0.6 – 0.79 pts.): Generally is able to
discuss the strength in alternative perspectives
·
Level 2 (0.4 – 0.59 pts.): Holds to only one
right possibility and/or rarely participates in multiple analysis
·
Level 0 (0 pts.): Either doesn’t participate or
participates in ways that are disrespectful or attacking
Item score (out of 1 pts.
max.):
Gives and uses feedback
constructively (1 point)
·
Level 5 (1 pts.): Consistently uses feedback to
expand understanding, knowledge, and competency and sought feedback in an
appropriate manner
·
Level 4 (0.8 – 0.99 pts.): Generally uses
feedback to expand understanding, knowledge, and competency and sought feedback
in an appropriate manner
·
Level 3 (0.6 – 0.79 pts.): Listens to feedback
but has difficulty using it to expand knowledge and competency and sought
feedback in an appropriate manner
·
Level 2 (0.4 – 0.59 pts.): Sometimes listens to
feedback to expand understanding, knowledge, and competency and sought feedback
in an appropriate manner
·
Level 0 (0 pts.): Seems unable or unwilling to
take feedback to expand knowledge and competency and sought feedback
appropriately
Item score (out of 1 pts.
max.):
Total score (out of 6 pts.
max.):
Expert Solution
In
terms of attendance and engagement, I would classify my professionalism
throughout the course as Level 4. I was present and active across all communication
channels, including messaging, video sessions, discussion forums, Voice-threads, and other platforms,
for approximately 90-80% of the course. According to Hanaysha, Shriedeh
&
In'airat (2023) this
predictable presence permits one
to remain educated and drew them
with the course contented,
encouraging a sense of
community inside the virtual learning surrounding.
This question has been solved!
- Verified by Admin
- Written by a Human Expert
Related Questions
- Ministerial Briefing
- M9 Application: Professional Participation Self-Evaluation
- Older Adults Datasheet
- M3 Individual Assignment: Sustainable Development Goals Exercise
- United States Government
- Declaration of Independence
- Peer Review Rough Draft
- Personal Values/Letter from a Birmingham Jail
- Extra Credit
- Causes and Impact of Chronic Poverty Among the Disabled in Developing Countries