EDED11457 Responding to
Diversity and Inclusion
Assignment Task 1: Responding
to Diversity and Inclusion
Student Name:
Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
Application of knowledge of key
concepts of stereotype, racism, prejudice and social justice. |
Comprehensive definitions and excellent examples of
stereotype, racism, prejudice and social justice that clearly demonstrate
definitions provided. |
Provides
complex definitions with links to good examples of stereotype, racism
prejudice and social justice. |
Provides
simple definition and relevant example of stereotype, and / or racism, and /
or prejudice and / or social justice.
|
Provides
definitions only of stereotype, racism prejudice, and social justice. |
Does
not provide an adequate definition or examples of key concepts of stereotype,
racism prejudice and social justice. |
Critical application of knowledge and
understanding of discrimination and social inclusion practices in Australia, particularly
those relating to people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds
(APST 1.4). |
An
in-depth argument on whether Australia can be regarded as an inclusive
society with relevant examples from media sources included that
comprehensively addresses practices relating to people of Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander backgrounds. |
Discusses
social inclusion practices in the context of Australian society with relevant
examples within the media and substantial references made to practices
relating to people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds. |
Defines
social inclusion and briefly discusses what this means in Australia. Some references are made to practices
relating to people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds.
|
Discusses
racism and prejudice in Australia, with minimal references made to inclusion practices
relating to people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds.
|
There
is limited or no substantial discussion concerning social issues within
Australia. |
Knowledge and understanding the legal
responsibilities of educators in school, classroom or care settings (APST
7.2), specifically in relation to relevant codes of conduct and ethics for
the teaching profession (APST 7.1). |
Identifies
relevant legislation and provides a comprehensive discussion on how
legislation informs inclusion policies and impacts on teacher practice. |
Identifies
and discusses relevant legislation regarding inclusion, the links to relevant
policies and why this is important for teachers to know.
|
Lists
relevant legislation and policies with some discussion of how these are
linked to classroom practice.
|
Identifies
some relevant legislation however limited discussion of how this is linked to
policy and practice. |
There
is limited understanding of the way in which specific legislation informs
policy and practice. |
Self-reflection on attitudes and
ability to respond to diversity and inclusion, specifically in relation to
engaging with community and professional representatives (APST 7.4), to
access continued professional learning that supports educators to improve
student learning (APST 6.4).
|
Self- reflection demonstrates insightful understanding
on how personal background, including cultural background, history,
experiences and attitudes influence responses to diversity and inclusion. Sophisticated understanding of the need to engaging
with community and professional representatives to maintain continued
professional learning that supports educators to improve student learning. |
Self-reflection shows a good understanding of
how personal background, including cultural background, history and
experiences come together to form attitudes and responses to student diversity
and inclusion in educational contexts. Substantial understanding of the need to engaging
with community and professional representatives to maintain continued
professional learning that supports educators to improve student learning. |
There has been some basic self-reflection of
how personal feelings towards diversity can impact on a teacher’s response to
access and participation of students in a classroom. Detailed understanding of the need to engaging
with community and professional representatives to maintain continued
professional learning that supports educators to improve student learning. |
Discussion shows a basic response to
diversity through understanding experiences of other people. Some understanding of the need to engaging
with community and professional representatives to maintain continued
professional learning that supports educators to improve student learning. |
There
has been limited discussion concerning personal attitudes, personal
experiences or background and how this influences attitude formation towards
inclusion. Limited understanding of the need to engaging
with community and professional representatives to maintain continued
professional learning that supports educators to improve student learning. |
Standard of academic writing including
correct language, terminology, referencing, grammar and formatting |
Accurate,
academically presented work; using appropriate language, terminology,
referencing, and grammar. Minimal errors. |
Accurate
and well-presented work; using appropriate language, terminology, referencing
and grammar. Minimal errors. |
Good
use of appropriate language, terminology, referencing and grammar but a few
errors noted. |
Sound
use of language, terminology, referencing and grammar. Considerable errors. |
Academic
writing style, grammar, spelling and formatting require in-depth attention. |
Key Concepts
Stereotype,
social justice, racism and prejudice are essential ideas in conversations
encompassing inclusion and diversity. These ideas give knowledge into the
elements of society, revealing insight into the intricacies and difficulties
looked by people and groups from different foundations.A stereotype alludes to
a broadly held yet distorted and summed up conviction or picture about a
specific group. These convictions frequently disregard the uniqueness and
variety inside the group and may prompt one-sided decisions (Karri and Dogra,
2023). For instance, the stereotype that all Asians are great at math
propagates the possibility that their value is exclusively founded on their
scholarly capacities, disregarding the horde of abilities and interests that
people inside this group might have