Produce an
individual argumentative essay of between 1,000 and 1,200 words that answers
the following question:
To what extent has the
internet contributed to academic misconduct in higher education? ?
ur essay must:
• Answer the assigned
question, in the appropriate format of an academic essay
• Be understandable for a
general audience (i.e. someone who
is not familiar with the subject area)
• Be within the word limit: 1,000-1,200 words
(excluding references)
• Use some or all of the secondary sources
supplied to support the arguments/points – referring to these with in-text
citations (Texts 1 - 5 provided)
• Have a complete reference list for all of
your sources – in a consistent and appropriate style
• Be submitted as a word document
(.doc or .docx)
Despite the educators' efforts to uphold high levels of academic integrity, cases of dishonesty have been increasing. Although, even before the introduction of the internet, there were cases of cheating in academics, the rise of the internet makes it easy to fabricate and plagiarize content. Initially, for academic misconduct to occur, someone had to find hard copy books and other learning materials to get information. Still, with the introduction of online learning, articles, books, and other academic sources, students can easily search for content and copy and paste. Students are aware of academic misconduct but want to excel in academics without committing to being responsible, honest, fair, trustworthy, and respectful. However, although the internet contributes to academic misconduct due to easy access to articles and other academic materials, there is a lack of strict policies and consequences for misconduct and proper guidance on what misconduct entails, which lead to rising cases.
In higher education, dishonesty could entail plagiarism, impersonation, altering academic documents, or copying answers from other students' work if the institution lacks clear policies. Misconduct in higher education mainly originates from peer behavior if the school administrators lack proper strategies to encourage academic integrity (Hughes and McCabe, 2006). For instance, if students realize that others have been plagiarizing, copying answers, and using other unfair means without being noticed to excel, they could be tempted to cheat to remain competitive in the class. In addition, damaging resources in the library and altering documents such as transcripts could also be termed academic misconduct. Also, it could be challenging for students to learn a second language to use expressions and make sentence structures without plagiarism (Hughes and McCabe, 2006). However, in some instances, the administration fails to educate new students on academic integrity and what misconduct entails, and the possible consequences during orientation. Therefore, although the easy access to learning materials on the internet contributes significantly to the increased level of academic misconduct, the administration could curb such behavior by clearly training students during orientation, which entails academic integrity and misconduct.
Moreover, in other instances,
students lack adequate knowledge of what constitutes academic misconduct and
the heightened cases (Perry, 2010).
However, the increased plagiarism and misconduct could be contributed by the
online enterprises that make customized research papers readily available to
students if they lack proper guidance on utilizing the materials to avoid
misconduct (Perry, 2010). In
addition to the impact of the internet, there is a wide range of literature
regarding academic misconduct. For instance, educators and students could hold
different perceptions, attitudes, and understanding of academic integrity/
misconduct. However, the increased concern about plagiarism and what it
constitutes increased with the introduction of the internet and the
establishment of online enterprises dealing with selling academic papers (Perry, 2010). However, there still
exists confusion as different institutions have different interpretations,
consequences, and policies regarding misconduct and reinforcement of academic
integrity. Therefore, although the internet plays a vital role in the
increasing academic misconduct, it is a lack of guidance on what misconduct
entails and a lack of proper strategies to enhance academic integrity that
contributes to misconduct to a great extent.
Although most universities are
struggling to eradicate cases of plagiarism, the introduction of Apps such as
Turnitin helps in encouraging students to avoid academic misconduct by
presenting their original work. Furthermore, the internet makes information
readily accessible, making it easy for students to gather relevant information
for their research papers and identify research gaps (Batane, 2010). However, if no strict rules are set to
curb plagiarism, students could be tempted to copy and paste, hindering
creativity and innovativeness. The Application has gained popularity in recent
years due to the increased use of the internet in learning to combat academic
misconduct. For instance, approximately 65% of students utilize the software,
although others felt that it deterred them from performing well in academics
due to detection of plagiarism (Batane,
2010). However, it ensures that students are not tempted to cheat
academically. Therefore, although the internet has made work easier for
educators and students, the establishment of the Turnitin software plays a
critical role in helping educators and students detect plagiarism in their
academic work to promote academic integrity.
However, the school
administration should have appropriate strategies for identifying ghostwriters
and plagiarized work as they are the primary forms of misconduct. In most
cases, ghostwriters could fail to adhere to the paper's guidelines or present a
similar paper which could be easy for the educators to detect (Sivasubramaniam, Kostelidou and
Ramachandran, 2016). However, although institutions have established
software such as Turnitin to curb plagiarism, there has been no solution to the
issue of ghost writers and purchasing academic papers to excel. For instance,
it could be difficult for educators to detect ghostwriters or purchased papers
if all guidelines and academic integrity are upheld. Although research
indicates that 60% of articles written by ghostwriters can be detected through
content matching, most of the ghostwriters are experts (Sivasubramaniam, Kostelidou and Ramachandran, 2016).
They tend to ensure that the papers have zero plagiarism and follow the
academic policies. Therefore, although the internet could increase academic
misconduct, apps such as Turnitin and hence lack of strict punishments for
misconduct lead to increased cases of misconduct. Therefore, too much inclusion
of the internet in education has worsened the rate of academic misconduct.
Students have become lazy in being creative and overly rely on the internet to
obtain content increasing the rate of cheating, ghostwriting paper purchasing,
and plagiarism.
However, although the internet
contributes to academic misconduct due to easy access to articles and other
academic materials, it is a lack of strict policies and consequences for
misconduct and lack of proper guidance on what misconduct entails that lead to
the rising cases of academic misconduct. Therefore, lack of guidance on what
misconduct entails and the lack of proper strategies to enhance academic
integrity contribute to misconduct to a great extent. However, in some
instances, the administration fails to educate new students on academic
integrity and offers the team what misconduct entails and the possible
consequences during orientation. However, educators and students could hold
different perceptions, attitudes, and understanding of academic integrity/
misconduct. However, although institutions have established software such as
Turnitin to curb plagiarism, there has been no solution to the issue of ghost
writers and purchasing academic papers to excel. Students have become lazy in
being creative and overly rely on the internet to obtain content increasing the
rate of cheating, ghostwriting paper purchasing, and plagiarism. However,
although the internet could increase academic misconduct, apps such as Turnitin
and hence lack of strict punishments for misconduct lead to increased
misconduct cases.
Bibliography
Batane,
T., 2010. Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university
students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2),
pp.1-12.
Hughes,
J. and McCabe, D., 2006. Understanding Academic Misconduct. Canadian
Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), pp.49-63.
Perry,
B., 2010. Exploring academic misconduct: Some insights into student
behaviour. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), pp.97-108.
Sivasubramaniam,
S., Kostelidou, K. and Ramachandran, S., 2016. A close encounter with
ghost-writers: an initial exploration study on background, strategies and
attitudes of independent essay providers. International Journal for
Educational Integrity, 12(1), pp.1-14.