Discussion #2

D‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍iscussion 2 is based on content from "The University Environment" (Week 5) All three questions are mandatory and questions #2 and #3, require citations (a total of 4 citations). https://theconversation.com/rape-on-campus-athletes-status-and-the-sexual-assault-cris is-72255

1.Hunting Ground Questions: users can search for “Hunting Ground” This film can be triggering. Your answer should have substance (if you make a statement, explain your reasoning and why you feel the way you do) and connect your answer to the film as much as possible. I am able to tell if students do not watch the film and try to answer the questions anyway. You will receive a zero on these questions if it is clear you did not watch the film.

A. Describe 2 parts of the film that stood out to you the most and explain why. They may have stood out because they shocked you, you thought they were powerful, or maybe because you disagreed with some aspect. Be as specific as possible (minimum 8-10 sentences, no citations required but always welcome, 3 points).

B. Were any voices missing from this film? Describe who and why/why not (minimum 3 sentences, no citations required but always welcome, 1 point).

2. Fraternities and Student Athletes: Using the content from Week 5, summarize the main findings presented in this module on the connection between fraternity membership, student athletics, and sexual violence on campus. Then, discuss your own observations and perspectives: Do you think there is a connection? How/why or why not? Why do you think this is happening? Support your observations with citations (minimum 8-10 sentences, must include 1 citation from Week 5 course material and 1‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍citation from outside the course, 3 points)

3. Title IX: Using the content from Week 5, summarize the major Title IX changes that took place in 2020 and then again in 2022. Then, describe your reactions to these changes and what you believe is the most fair approach to managing Title IX cases on university campuses (minimum 6-8 sentences, must include 1 citation from Week 5 course material and 1 citation from outside the course, 2 points)

4. What do you think of these protests? Min 0 - 0:05 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fbN08zF7Q8 Academic Integrity It is crucial that you do your own work and that you do not copy any of your answers from websites or other people. You cannot copy and paste off a website, this is plagiarism. Discussion Post Guidelines:

1. (20%) Length. See length requirements above

2. (50%) Comprehension. Demonstrate an understanding and application of the course readings and outside material to answer the question.

3. (20%) Citations/References. Four citations total. The purpose of citations/references is to support claims you are making in your answers. You MUST cite using the directions above. Each question may have a different citation requirement, so please read carefully. Citation format should use either APA, MLA, or Chicago style. You should cite both within the text and provide a full reference at the bottom of your response(s). ? An example of an APA style in-text citation is (American Psychological Association, 2021). ? An example of APA style full reference is: American Psychological Association. (2021). Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/about/apa/equity-diversity-inclusion/language guideli‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‍nes.p

1.Two parts of the film that stood out were the personal stories of the survivors and the portrayal of institutional responsiveness. In the film, survivors of sexual harassment share their experiences, which highlight the psychological and emotional effects of sexual assault imposed on the victims. Moreover, two survivors, Ari and Alexis, explain their ordeal to the university students, hence showing courage, and it also assists other students with similar experiences to come out. The stories shared made an impact because they humanize the issue and emphasize the need for support and justice for the survivors who have been sexually assaulted. On the other hand, the lack of responses from institutions to sexual assault reports is highlighted in the film. The film showcases the prevalence of victim-blaming, institutional cover-ups, and placing reputation over survivor's well-being. The film highlights that the management did not take serious action toward the reports because they received incentives. This situation was appalling and eye-opening because it exposed the failures of the systems in institutions that perpetuate the challenge of sexual assault on campuses.

This question has been solved!

Verified by Admin
Written by a Human Expert

Unlock Solution Get Custom Solution

Question

Discussion #2

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Related Questions