Before
writing your discussion thread, please take the Multiple Intelligences Test
attached. Once you have the results of the test, you can address the following
discussion prompts with your own personal results in mind.Do you think
“multiple intelligences” is a valid construct? In other words, do multiple
intelligences exist? (Be sure to include connections to the textbook/research
when building your argument.) Do you think that the Multiple Intelligences Test
you took gave a valid picture of your intellectual abilities? In other words,
do you think that test accurately measured what it is
supposed to measure? Provide at least one recommendation about how the
developers of this multiple intelligences test could demonstrate evidence for
the validity of the test. Your recommendation should focus on one of the
types of validity described in the textbook [i.e.,
content-related validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, or
construct validity (using convergent or discriminant evidence)]. Finally, make
a biblical argument either for or against the existence of multiple
intelligences. Whichever stance you take, be sure to back it up with meaningful
and relevant Scripture references.
1.Multiple
intelligences do exist and can be backed using credible sources and theories. Gardner
created the Multiple Intelligences Test to prove his idea, which looks at how
well a person can make educated guesses about their innate intellect. His
framework and theory propose seven distinct types of intelligence: linguistic,
logical, kinesthetic, music, spatial, interpersonal, and intrapersonal (Miele,
2018). Each intellect has a specified job description, set of responsibilities,
and method of education. My research has led me to conclude that there are more
than two types of intellect thus supporting that multiple intelligences are a
valid construct.