Question

Law and Psychology

This paper is on the intersection of the law and psychology . In this paper, you are to select a branch of forensic psychology: clinical, experimental, or policy/legal. Once you select a general area, you are to find a state or federal court case ruling that relates to the area. Then do the following:

Explain the branch of psychology in depth, along with the subcategory that you are discussing.

Cite, explain, and elaborate on the court case. What was the premise? What issues were involved? What was the ruling?

Outline the justifications of the ruling and the impact that the ruling has had on the field.

 Papers must be in APA format and must be presented in a cohesive manner

*You are to use at least 6 reputable resources (at least 5 must be journals). No textbook or Wikipedia references!!!

*6 page minimum (not including references and abstract)

*References must be included

*Papers must include an abstract

Your topic must be cleared by me in advance to avoid duplication. I will post a google doc. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE!!! If you opt to do so, you will receive a ZERO!

Due August 9th

Expert Solution

The fields of law and psychology are interdependent, allowing for effective results in the criminal justice system. Psychology helps study human behavior, and the law aims to control it through deterrence and rehabilitative methods. The issue of juvenile life without parole sentences has been under debate for a prolonged period. Researchers claim that there are differences between children and adults as the American law recognizes in other aspects such as voting, drinking, serving on a jury, and marriage. However, they were previously subjected to similar punishment as adults. Cases like Romper v. Simmons and Graham v. Florida have changed the law by imposing categorical bans on extreme juvenile punishment based on adult-child differences. However, the Miller v. Alabama case is distinct in forensic clinical psychology because it mandated procedural safeguards to ensure the defendant's age and characteristics were accounted for before a juvenile was granted a LWOP sentence. As such, it did not offer a substantive right but only procedural protection based on adult-child differences.

This question has been solved!

  • Verified by Admin
  • Written by a Human Expert
Unlock Solution Get Custom Solution
Blurred answer

Related Questions