Given the process by which it was
developed, how confident can we be that the Big Five model provides
a valid description of personality?
Society has discovered
the relation between personality and psychopathology, whereby the current
community is majorly focused on analyzing the function of the former in the
field of the latter. The Big Five Model, also termed FFM (The Five-Factor
Model), is a famous approach that enables the audience to learn more about
human personality, and it covers five personality qualities; openness, extraversion,
agreeableness, neuroticism, and conscientiousness (Shi et al., 2018). It is an
approach that uses the mentioned traits to try and understand as well as
analyze people’s actions and behaviors. The openness personality describes
creative or artistic individuals, while the extraversion trait indicates
assertive and enthusiastic people. Agreeableness is connected to gentleness,
reliability, and warmth; neuroticism is demonstrated as self-consciousness,
while conscientiousness is understood as the inclination to competence and dutifulness
(Shi et al., 2018). Even though the model deals with one of the significant
aspects of psychopathology, and despite its shortcomings, it is relevant to proving
its validity, the primary aim of this paper.