The
therapeutic process is an intimate process. There are many forms of intimacy.
Emotional intimacy, especially when it is missing in one's life, can be
attractive (for the client and/or therapist). Intimacy is not only attractive
but it can also be desirable & easy to confuse it as an attraction towards
the person within the context where such intimacy is produced. Thus, one
especially needs to check one's use of transparency/self-disclosure in light of
what kind of intimacy is getting created within the therapeutic relationship.
Last week you reflected on self-disclosure, continue reading about it this week
in Robert's paper (2005). What is appropriate self-diclosure is not only
determined by the therapeutic context but also by our theories. When a
therapist discloses, it also makes the therapist vulnerable (in a good sort of
a way), thus what gets created & how it shapes the context and the
relationship is key to the process of therapeutics. But at times, such
vulnerability can also generate a false sense of intimacy for the therapist
(especially, when the therapist has not processed what he/she is self-disclosing).
Yet, to share one's vulnerability can also be an excellent therapeutic tool as
spoken in this video: https://www.youtube.
1. What were
your reaction or questions on reading this chapter and/or article?
2. How do you
make sense of the fact thaton one hand the APA ethical code explicitly states
not to accept former lovers as clients (Code 10.07) and
on the other hand it only has a moratorium of two years with regard to sexual
intimacy with former clients (Code 10.08)?
Would you recommend changing one or the other code or neither? References:
1. Koocher, G.P., and
Keith-Spiegel, P. (2016). Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health
Professions: Standards and Cases. (4th Edition). New York: Oxford 2. Roberts,
J. (2005). Transparency and self-disclosurein family therapy. Family Process,
44, 45-63. **Reading is attached in pdf format.
Professional counselling necessitates the counsellor
to uphold professionalism and boundary between them and the client as one of the fundamentals of counseling.
Self-disclosure is essential to establish trust and a sense of connection
between client, and therapist. Self-disclosure has the potential to be an effective
therapeutic tool; nevertheless, it must be utilized carefully (Roberts, 2005). The distinctions between the counselor-client
relationship and the professional roles may become mishandled due to
inappropriate self-disclosure. The ethical counselor will therefore need to be
aware of the limits of self-disclosure to ensure the safety and effectiveness
of the therapeutic relationship and position the client for success. Therefore
Self-disclosure is a vital tool in the therapeutic relationship and can promote
positive outcomes for clients.